There is a DISGUSTING Narrative Women are taking to Social Media with that I need to explain

Many of you might be aware about this, but I need to strongly explain and emphasize what exactly Women are doing lately, in a new clever attempt they discovered to try to "exploit" Men's power or influence and warp it into something else it isn't, and especially redirecting it through the lens of Homoerotic Tendencies, which do not exist, but also deflect responsibility from Women.

Lately, Women in their bullshit minds about being "Strong, Empowered, Independent" and so on, have loved to justify the fact that they don't need to do anything for Men, as a symbol of who they really are, and also insisting now that they were never really "submissive", but suggesting that the true gender which wants and loves "submission" are MEN.

Women have taken to Social Media especially on TikTok and other platforms to push some bogus ideas about Men being the real "submissive" gender, and  not Women.

And they are suggesting this from the standpoint that Men observe Hierarchies, especially in Military, Political Leadership, In Companies and Society in general, and they believe the fact that Men take orders from other Men correlates with a Man's desire to be submissive, and this is absolute verbal diarrhea.

Men who take orders from other Men, do so on the basis that Men accept responsibility but also have a general sense of respect to their Superiors and Order.

This is especially even much more pronounced for example in German culture, and in a much more natural way (or it used to be during the Reich) rather than a performative way, such as what one would find in Oriental cultures.

But the fact is that, Hierarchy, or the desire to form and implement a Hierarchy in a Social Order, is an extremely natural primitive and instinctual desire, and all species wish to establish and do establish their own Hierarchies.

Men also understand why Hierarchy is essential, because Men naturally understand Honor and Duty, whereas Women don't, and that has been a major flaw in the developmental course of our history as a species, to remove Women from the harsh realities of nature.

Men, naturally understand, that order must exist, at least in some shape or form, and this exists in virtually every race, not just Germans, however it exists the least in Negroes.

With the Negro, it's a bit complicated however, because Negroes have always had a primal instinct to dominate others on the basis of perceived values, but more so from a root of very loosely formed associations or Hierarchies that are not necessarily merit based or always based on racial purity, although perhaps many of them would like it to be that way.

In my course of studying racial groups, I would also argue that much of the on-going centuries of conflicts for example in African Peoples or Negroes wherever they reside, along with the American Indians and their conflicts between tribes, largely had to do with the desire but challenges of forming rigid, lasting Hierarchies that would endure, however this was not always the case for every single tribe or people, as some had successfully established those Hierarchies, if it even came down to the most brutal form of applying barbarism along with slavery and torture to achieve it, which still even exists in some parts of Africa today (between their own people, not speaking of outside forces or Imperialists).

Women just want another excuse to suggest that they were never intended for Submission, and also what's worse, is that they also want to turn it around to suggest that it all means that Men secretly wish to be "submissive" to Women as well.

For example, if Women had to understand a proper sense of discipline and responsibility in society, they would understand even more so why their submission is mandatory, and that it completely transcends anything to do with gender identity or roles, but is a part of where society must understand their place, both Men and Women independently must understand their place and not talk over their superiors.

It is important and crucial to understand where the origin of these twisted ideas spring up from in a society that not only is over-run by NPC's, but the very fact that things like "Bodily Autonomy" are relatively new concepts, and artificial ones at that, which have birthed from Liberal and New Age thinking, which are basically a scourge.

Women simply want to take down "Hierarchy" because it essentially means destroying civilization, and please understand that when I speak of "civilization" or the state of being "civilized", I am not talking about the modern pussywhipped, sterilized security states we now live in where everything is monopolized, but I mean civilizations in the sense of where Humans live beyond the level of simply the animal level only.

As a Prussian, even with Anti-Natalist views, one thing I can absolutely assure you is that there is NOTHING more disgraceful and an abomination than living in a Society where there is no type of Order or Hierarchy, and where people know their place, and anyone who begs to disagree with me on those views, should take notice to the fact that the erosion of these Hierarchies is exactly what has led to the Mentally ill becoming "emboldened" in their megalomania the way they are today in America and Europe especially, where they see themselves as "superiors" to the actual real superiors, and where they have turned our societies into complete Insane Asylums where everything exists the opposite of what it should be, and where criminals are rewarded and people who are simple or live an honest life are routinely scrutinized, persecuted and punished both by their governments and the society at large who bullies them.

That is why we need hierarchy, and that is why for example under most courses of German history, until Germany became a Democracy, that having a sense of duty in society was so strongly encouraged and enforced, even down to severe consequences for those who did not obey.

However, one thing you should understand as well, and I am not ignorant of this fact or pretending to just not see outside of the box, but what modern people do not understand today is that things you might see as negative such as having a responsibility or duty to others in society, can only work properly with both efficiency and purpose or effectiveness under an Authoritarian society.

Do not kid yourself for one moment that I would believe such efforts are even feasible or negotiable under the Democratic modes of life we live under today, I am not implying that I expect you as a young Man to start paving roads, building parking lots and shopping malls for a society around you that HATES you and wants to take everything from you, it simply would not work.

Under a Democracy, your efforts and duties become "punished" and will be wasted and exploited, and this is the essential problem with Democracies as a whole, a painful reality that many Democracy lovers in the West will one day have to contend with since on one hand they want to have a Democracy and also yet a society that is orderly and where people are somehow united in a common goal, which is akin to wanting to have your cake and eat it too (while there is only one cake),

Heck, even Authoritarianism doesn't work correctly under Democracies, and all Democracies develop some shape or form of it, even if it's influenced by the Masses and their votes or agendas, because what happens is that it leads to a society where basically everything is ruined and torn down and there is a tendency to destroy and ruin the lives of the best people in society while empowering and protecting the most worthless specimens of society.

In Democracies, this is not just achieved as it would be from a Top-Down level under an Aristocracy, but the fact that under Democracies, the People act as a "dead weight" where the most powerful people at the top of the Democracy can with ease, use one segment of the population to punish and destroy the other faction or factions that do not comply.

You MUST understand instantly that if Women had things their way, ULTIMATELY, that they would LOVE to bring us back to living in mud huts and where everyday we face starvation, disease and instability in society, and then on top of it all, they will blame "Men" to be responsible for bringing us back to that state as well.

The Gravy Train for Women is coming to an end and it must be cut from them with the most extreme brute force as if one had the determination to eradicate a weed by daily ruthless use of the machete to eradicate it's chance to even sprout.

 https://www.azquotes.com/picture-quotes/quote-what-feminism-calls-patriarchy-is-simply-civilization-an-abstract-system-designed-by-camille-paglia-109-98-00.jpg

 

Comments

  1. In a curious voice(maybe proving me wrong) first of all(can't we say we are living in the most authoritarian of all times and this is in fact what makes life miserable? and women in the past decades maybe there were many instances in small situation where this hierarchy was just used not as a way to improve anything or build sth but simply to assert dominance and power(extracting other people's resources(in that kind of mindset wouldn't any species also want to establish some kind of monopoly on their power?(their obsessions with having the most regulations stupid state enforced violence or living in total captivity in which they are protected and calling that the best life also their voracious desire to collect as many titles or belittle greatness or anything serious(just the result of seeing how much without a point all of it is? is civilization really worth it? I know in the real world we care about honor trying to be better fighting for freedom honesty but at the end of the day isn't all of it just turns into another show for enslavement and establishing societies for the sole purposes of sick desires? to the point life in itself becomes a number on strength height intelligence looks...everything just a number as if we are machines in that kind of world(many men talk about these things(but in my arrogant naive thinking I believe it is men themselves who are responsible for the tragedies that we are witnessing(it is all those indifferent behaviors and trying to just hurt other men and never believing anything real in your fellow brothers(most of them also prefer to just hang out with women? am I wrong on this? I don't see any men's space which does not try to hurt or get sadistic pleasure in humiliating each other or is not self destructive? ofc they turn to women(even with their never ending insanity(Me? maybe I am just sad lonely little guy who just spreads negativity/thanks for reading

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @mani,

      Through previous cycles in the rise and fall of past Empires, once the decay sets in place, surely those would be the times that civilizations typically maintained Hierarchies more from a standpoint of Formalism or just living through the motions either because of power being handled down the family lines such as the case through a Monarchy, or otherwise when a civilization becomes too successful for its own good or has subversive elements that begin the process of dismantling it.

      When that process ensues, the behavior of everyone from the Kings and Emperors or Presidents or Prime Ministers, down to the everyday citizen begins to espouse and give lip service to ideas that are much more about rhetoric and formalism rather than believing in it wholeheartedly or even practicing what they preach on a regular basis.

      For example, look at today's England, and then read the lyrics of Rule Britannia.

      Or in the case of America, the Star Spangled Banner.

      Do the lyrics at the end where it says "Over The Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave!"

      It's a joke that Americans and leaders who consider themselves "Patriots" can even actually sing in or feel inspiration or believe these lyrics, since America is nothing but a land of the Cowards and the Home of the Slaves!

      But they will do so from a rhetorical standpoint without shame, because they "like" to believe it's true, even though the behavior of American citizens actually demonstrates a people who despise freedom. What they mean when they speak "Freedom" means the right to Freely destroy other Nations through War and genocide their people, or to practice LGBT rights or smoke marijuana.

      Outside of dumb liberal shit like this, Americans couldn't care less about Freedom or overthrowing Tyrants, and you can see this through how much more that Americans love censorship especially on the internet, and blocking anyone even over the silliest things.

      What comes about from Democratic modes of life in Nations that are classified as "Democracies" - and it matters not whether they consider themselves a True Democracy or Not in practice, just like it matters not to debate what a Real versus a Fake Jew is.

      The fact is that all Democracies, right or wrong in how they conduct themselves, form a very Cowardly society that basically ceases to allow the fruits inherent of a people to naturally develop such as merit, talent or other unique attributes.

      Democracy, essentially promotes a form of Egalitarianism where the strong or unique members must be "cut down" to the same tree height as all other citizens, and this essentially is WRONG and it is also Anti-Nature in any and every form one could imagine, even in a world where things are not fair to begin with, and that essentially is what makes Democracy pave the road destiny towards Communism.

      A civilization "can" be worth it, but it all has to do with how that civilization is founded and what the ambitions of its founders decide on.

      The problem is, civilizations which base their ideas on eternal, never-ending growth and ambition, often end up falling apart, instead of maintaining status or enduring, because they become too proud over the long run of things, and that many civilizations have only been allowed to flourish to the extent they do based on special banking families which provided investments, loands and merchant cartels that allowed resources from all over the world to be pooled to allow such civilizations to develop.

      You could have a primitive "village-like" civilization that maintains a very basic level of existence, and that can still be suffice, even without all kinds of advanced technology, what really is important at the foundational level of a civilization is that a group of people who are a tribe, automatically feel a sense of complete harmony, unity and mutual interest and desire to live, eat and practice lifestyles that are completely the same or similar in nature that relieve everyone of too many numerous responsibilities or the risks that come with Anarchy and instability.

      Delete
    2. @mani, CONTINUED:



      We don't need all the ridiculous levels of institutional power like it exists today, and whereby everything is monopolized even down to the point that Police and Authorities, even Corporations have a total monopoly on Violence, the produces you consume or wear, and basically everything else.

      These items which have come into existence, including things like Gambling Casinos, Insurance Companies and so on, should not even exist.

      They came into existence from populations that grew cowardly, pacifistic and obsessed with creating artificial tools or instruments to prop up society at the expense of others to maintain their wealth or prestige. And NPC's in particular, have been very elemental into giving a helping hand in all of that the most.

      But I believe you would probably at least agree with me that it would be less desirable to have to go back to living where we needed to use shit buckets.

      In fact, when Kings have lost power, there have been periods where even the Kings had to reduce themselves to that kind of squalor and living circumstances.

      The bottom line is, the best people have to be the ones who are in charge of ruling any civilization, no matter the form of government, and ideally such Men would not be the type who are too obsessed with Money and Power to where they throw out all other measures and the quality of life, because they are not sustainable in the long run, even when a Nation becomes so powerful and influential the it feels invincible.

      And if we need slaves, the best slaves to use for building a civilization are the criminals, reproduces, and loser dregs of society to make use of their pathetic minds and bodies.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Great New Goatis Videos On Telegram

Buckle Up For A Stupid Year of 2026 Ahead

The Charlie Kirk Psyop Is Evaporating