I Really Wish More Men Knew You Don't Need To Be Providers For Women
Your Value as a Man have nothing to do with your ability to "provide" for a Woman.
All of this is religious conditioning, and the sooner you understand that if Men gave up this idea that they need to "prove" themselves to Women or provide them anything, then the sooner it means GAME OVER for Women as a whole.
Once Women are not provided for, Men can take them into captivity once again any which way they wish.
Empowering Women, Giving Them Rights and Autonomy, and Money, is one of the silliest ideas that some "Men" ever came up with to do.
It's Weak Beta Males who came up with these ideas in an "effort" to try to use it as tools to attract Women.
Strong Men simply "take" Women, and it means taking them in any which way you do, even as War booty.
This is actually the "natural" course of how things are supposed to work.
Only Cowardly Men believed in giving Women rights, including the more "cowardly" ranks of some German Men too in the course of German History.
STOP providing for Women and protecting them. They are provided and protected more than they EVER have been throughout history and from multiple sources including the Governments and their Place of Employment.
This needs to stop, and it needs to stop even at the behest of the extermination of Humankind.
Genetically inferior men are the ones who started this shit...
ReplyDeleteWhen I was 18, a freshman college, I hooked up with about 5-10 great looking women in a few months on campus...
The catch was I didn't spend a penny!
Glad I didn't fuck up my life, as I was very naive about the nature of women back then.
Had some fun though ..18 is a great age for a strapping young man.
@Joey Aragon,
ReplyDeleteTruth Be Told!!!
Actually even for myself, I had much more action with Women in my years when I didn't have a "place" and had hardly any money.
As soon as you get your life together and have a life, Women find this "boring" oddly enough, and they are nowhere to be found, even though I never had initiatives to give them anything.
So yeah, at the same time we have these Beta fucks who are making Women more expensive and as a liability for Men AS A WHOLE irrespective of what your ambitions of any kind with exist with Women or don't, because Women think they are entitled.
This entitlement could even translate to YOU as a Man, going to a restaurant or bar and being given an attitude by some stupid bitch server because she expects a "larger tip" because of all the stupid Beta fucks who give them BIG tips and money for NOTHING.
You can always tell when a Man is genetically inferior online or even if he never had a lot of Women in his youth if it's some guy at the bar or what have you, because it's always "These" Men who are obsessed with the idea of legalizing prostitution.
Prostitution in itself is a net negative, because it is a breeding ground for std's that are then getting spread from the "Johns" to the general public thru the intercourse with their actual wives / girlfriends / hook-ups. Even condoms can't prevend most std's except for aids! Most people don't know that fact! Furthermore it destroys society / civilization, because it demotivates men to found their own families, thus it decreases the birth-rates of a nation and it makes the actual whores worthless to be wives and mothers. But this brings me to my point:
DeleteMaking prostitution illegal in a society like ours, meaning, within an anti-patriarchial system, is even worse, because it would only increase the sexual market value of even the most unattractive females, thus the feminists are working tirelessly to ban prostitution, esspecially here in Germany, to increase their low sexual market value.
Legal prostitution is one of the reasons german women are not as entitled as american women and german men not as desperate as american men, because you can have sex with the hottest women in the world here for only 100€ an hour. This decreases the sexual market value of the average german woman, who can't compete with all these young east-european women and latinas.
As an anti-natalist you should therefore promote world-wide-prostitution, because it would decrease the birthrates to such low levels, that humanity would die off thru the resulting genetic-defects (incest / shrinking-gene-pool) and the super mutations of the std's.
Prostitution being legalized, is almost akin to what the Development of Agriculture has spawned.
DeleteThat's the problem with it. Men who aspire to Legalize Prostitution, wish to eliminate the grounds of Natural Selection and have deep within them, enemy and resentment for the fact that desire only exists between some specimens, and they want to eliminate these barriers and that's how the system of utilizing Money to attract Mates, which Nature would otherwise not entitle to them, has become a process today.
It's every Capitalist's "Wet Dream" for Prostitution to be legalized, sometimes even in the most literal sense of the words, because most of them have horrible health and bald very easily with their obsession of money and never took care of their bodies, and expect to have Top Tier Women at their fingertips solely on the basis of affordability, rather than Genuine Attraction.
They've created a world where Women routinely became used too or lured into sleeping with Men who are otherwise undesirable and even dangerous, which is why we have so many Predatory, Psychopathic Members in Modern Day society.
As far as my Anti-Natalist views are concerned, I've long stressed the fact that I'm not a "Religious" Anti-Natalist, meaning that I do not ideologically concern myself with things that are easily attached or somehow beneficial to the goal of Anti-Natalism, just because.
For example, a lot of Feminists and LGBTQ people also can fall into the notion of being "Compatible" with Anti-Natalism, but does that mean we should be aligned with them? Absolutely not.
I'm not going to espouse or defend LGBTQ people on the basis of Anti-Natalism, just because their prerogatives fall into the line of them not being able to have children.
Same with anything else.
I am an Anti-Natalist because I am against this existence and know it to be a very miserable and pointless place.
You seem not to understand, even as an anti-natalist, that natural selection and nature in itself is not "good", but very flawed and furthermore you not seem to understand how natural selection, in this case, human sexual selection works, because you have it all upside down:
DeleteMale sexual selection is visual and hence eugenic in nature.
Female sexual selection is emotional and hence dysgenic in nature.
That is the reason the "chosen ones" destroyed the patriarcy to begin with, which was based on male sexual selection, which lead to eugenics of our people, hence why our ancestors were smarter and way more beautiful than the people of today, which are the product of feminism, meaning, female sexual selection, which always leads to the degeneration of the race, hence why the "Edomites" using feminism as a weapon to degenerate and kill off our race.
Men select women primarly (unconciously!) for good genetical markers that express themselves thru different physical traits like wide hips, big buttocks, small waist, long legs, full long hair, fair skin complexion etc. this sexual selection process is universal to all man of all various races and it is programmed into us by the "blind will to life", hence why all races prefer white women, even over their own, when having the choice. (I assume you are familiar with Schopenhauers work, who coined the phrase of "the blind will to life".) So men, in generale, always select women based on good genetics.
Women, however, are NOT AS visual as men, esspecially when it comes to sexual selection. They primarly are getting aroused thru their emotions, which only are getting triggered thru dominance, because the number one goal of our human "software-program", called the blind will to life, is the reproduction of the species and dominant men can successfully, without hesitation, shame or mental blockage, unlike the modern submissive beta male, innitiate sexual intercourse (reproduction), thus the blind will to life is rewarding these men with the immediate sexual arousal of the female and thus the female is not aroused by the beta male, even if he is "8 feet tall, with more hair like an arab woman on her back, having a 12 inch penis and a jawline that could cut thru diamonds", i.e. having the best genes, but the woman would rather be "plowed" by an 5,5 dominant alpha male. (And I say that as a man with no "dog in this fight", being 1.85 m myself.)
(This is also the reason most women experience orgasms during rape, as the blind will to life does not care for the individual, but only for continuation of the species and thus authentic, meaning, natural male dominance is the only real aphrodisiac for the female!)
Therefore the blind will to life is blind and very flawed and so women are attracted to dominant men, even if they have terrible genes! And this is exactly the reason the people of the west are now full of undesirable people. All these young generations were breed by "choice" of the female, who had no need to do so other than based on her primarly sexual selection / arousal / instinct. Women in the west have no pressure to reproduce based on resources of the men as you suggest, because white women are financially independent from white men (thru the divorce-laws, the social welfare state and the working force) and so they don't have to breed for resources, as they can now easily get bred by the alpha males and still later on find a beta provider for their offspring. And this is excactly what they are doing! There is even a study that shows that women would rather breed with men who have an IQ on the level of retardation, than to breed with intelligent men with an IQ of over 130, as long as the retards are dominant, the vagina gets aroused.
CONTINUE: By your own logic, we should therefore all support feminism, because it leads to "natural selection" by the female, who can then "finally" select men based on sexual attraction (genuine attraction) other than on resources etc. which is what is now exactly happening, as I have explained.
DeleteAnd yes, using resources or even force (rape), is the reproductive strategy of the undesireables, meaning, the men with bad genetics, hence why the negores rape so much.
@Amor,
DeleteI've already long addressed the issue of Non-visual Women and why Non-visual Women are worthless and not desirable in the gene pool. The emotions of Non-visual are Worthless, because they don't even understand those emotions.
It wouldn't even make sense for Women to not be visual even if such a thing as "evolution" existed and the desire for a stable family unit and relationship between Men and Women, because once Women's emotions change, they leave the Man.
Yes, I have read many works by Schopenhauer included the one you've mentioned.
All Alpha Males are slaves, being an Alpha Male is not actually something to aspire to, or be, even if one is wired to be. Alpha Males are servants. Betas are as well, but a different kind. The Alpha is obsessed to show off his abilities.
>There is even a study that shows that women would rather breed with men who have an IQ on the level of retardation, than to breed with intelligent men with an IQ of over 130, as long as the retards are dominant, the vagina gets aroused.<
Yes, you are correct about this, I have seen the studies, and Women in general are largely turned off by Intelligent Men.
All the more pointing to the greater facts that Intelligent People, whether of their own choice or not, are not the great breeding factor.
At least you can see just how flawed the Human Species is, and all of this demonstrates just how much of an Experiment our bodies and the Human creation is, to rule and govern over, and keeping them dependent on their biological urges to reproduce.
As far as your concerns about how Women choose the worst to breed with, all of this is tied in with the NPC and Demonic nature of those who have successfully bred over time, versus the ones who were not of those types.
You have to understand that NPC Women do not seek to breed with Men whom they like or to have closeness with those Men. They only care about continuing the genetic lineages on to weed out the rest of Human populations, and also are there for the benefits that come from raising their children to be slaves or take care of them later in life.
@Amor
DeleteAll that being said, it makes the perfect combination with this tampering of Mankind, to permit the Slave Farming of Humans to be pervasive and complete. Think about it.
Because even NPC Men will be visual, while NPC Women are not visual.
When a Man is visual (Most Men are), but Women are not, or not "as visual", inevitably the Man and Woman will not have anything common, even when interests do overshadow.
NPC Women are not interested in connections with Men or anything that goes above the biological instincts that suit their reproductive strategies. And they view Men in and of themselves, not as a Human, but as a reproductive strategy.
This is because the thinking processes that lead to a recreational activity, or interest, even "attraction" are completely at odds with one another, and not in "Harmony".
Rendering them incompatible, but with the urge to reproduce being the primal goal of these NPC's, it just creates more and more useless trash like this that makes up the majority of mankind, and that's why we are at where we are at today.
Even in the 1980's in the United States, at least around 75% of the population were NPC's even by that time alone. Today just about 99% of the US Population are NPC's, and it's not all that better anywhere in Europe or the rest of the world over, either.
For Example, in Germany, over 90% of the population are NPC's, and that's the average going rate for about most average countries, with a lower end somewhere in the high 80's for "some" countries.
Women, whether NPC (= extraverted biorobot) or not, are by design not as visual as men, esspecially when it comes to sexual selection. That means that when sexually selecting a mate due to sexual arousal, the visual appearance of the male plays A LESSER role than vice-versa. That does not mean that women don't also find certain physicial traits of men attractive and arousing, which I can personally confirm due to my own experinces. However, this has nothing to do with the nature of the NPC's, which I will explain later on, since I read that you seem to also have a false take on that one too.
Delete"It wouldn't even make sense for Women to not be visual even if such a thing as "evolution" existed and the desire for a stable family unit and relationship between Men and Women, because once Women's emotions change, they leave the Man."
Bingo! You got! That's why Schopenhauer called it "the blind will to life", because this force is blind and irrational! Women leave men as soon as "their feelings" are turned off. Men and women are fundamentally speaking, incompatible, because women are hypergamous and men are polygamous thats why our forefathers estbalished the patriarchy to cope with that very fact, meaning human nature, which is self-destructive, because life itself is irrational and self-destructive!
"All Alpha Males are slaves, being an Alpha Male is not actually something to aspire to, or be, even if one is wired to be. Alpha Males are servants. Betas are as well, but a different kind. The Alpha is obsessed to show off his abilities." That is utter nonsense. It is in fact the exact opposite. I think you have the wrong definition of what constitutes an "alpha male". Alpha males are simply men who are dominant with women, because their don't "love" (idealize) them, the way beta males do. By this fact alone they don't become emotional dependent on a certain female and thus they always act in their own best self interest, as every man should be! Thus, they can't be taken advantage off. Plain and simple. They "use" women for their specific needs, instead the other way around (beta dynamic). The beta males getting used on all levels from the female, not the alpha. The alpha males are the men who live polygam, even when being married to just one female. The females do everything for them, including killing other people for them. Stuff that most men (beta males) could never imagine. The female serves the alpha males on all levels in order to please them. Every man who can establish such an dynamic with a female is a natural born alpha male. Plain and simple. It is the best place to be in for every man on earth, and beta men loath and hate on the alpha males, because they instinctively know they will never be able to establish such a dynamic with a female, even if their life would depend on it.
"NPC Women are not interested in connections with Men or anything that goes above the biological instincts that suit their reproductive strategies. And they view Men in and of themselves, not as a Human, but as a reproductive strategy."
DeleteYou said you read Schopenhauer? I wonder why you then still show this very idealized version of the human connection that suggest, "romantic love" is based on something other then the blind will to life? All "love" is primarly only driven by the blind will to life, which only goal is the continuation of the species. Similiar interests etc. don't play a role for sexual attraction. These interest interest only play a role in long-term relationships / compatibility. This goes for both sexes, whether one is an NPC (extraverted) or not.
For example, you could meet a female that you find physically attractive, that dresses like you or similar, has the same taste for music, the same world-view and even the same sex drive as you, but as long as you are not dominant in regards to her, she will not be sexually aroused by your presents, despite all your same interests. However, if you don't find that same woman physically attractive, you will not be sexually aroused by her present and thus you would not want to form a relationship with her, despite all her similarities with you. I will repeat myself: The blind will to life does not care about a harmonious relationship, but only for the continuation of the species.
Women (not talking about the NPC's here, who don't have a personality / inner core and thus can't have any real, subjective interests that stem from within them, besides their social programming!) want consciously a deep connection with men, yet the blind will to life makes this almost impossible, because the blind will to life works thru every human being, autonomously, just like your organs and is not operating on same interests when it comes to sexual arousal. Humans have no free will!
That is also some of the reasons, why a lot of marriages in the west fall apart so quickly. The female selected a mate based on sexual attraction / sexual arousal, not on the bases of compatibility (Schopenhauer described this very dynamic over 100 years ago), so after the first, or second child, she realized that she was trcked by her own emotions and thus feels only disgust for her man. It can be also the other way around. After the man had intercourse for a long period of time ("getting his rocks off"), he comes to his senses and leaves the woman he actually despises, as he now can cleary think again, without his raging hormones in the way.
@Amor
ReplyDeleteI have heard Aajonus Vonderplanitz say something along the STD's are a myth and caused by improper diet. I haven't researched much about it, personally.
Even then, promoting world-wide prostitution would be useless in the grand scheme of things since the problem is women themselves, they need to be eliminated. Decreased birth rates from world wide prostitution I believe would make little difference to the total population.
I know it is a hypothetical idea you're just presenting, and it might help a little, yet it is not the religious pursuit of anti-natalism as an idea but rather the end goal of the elimination of the human species in which anti-natalism happens to play a role in.
It is better to concern yourself with how to destroy this place instead of saving it.
Not proud of this...
DeleteBut I have been with about 500 partners (or more, I lost count)...and half were hookers, and never got anything.
It is a hoax IMHO.
@Joey Aragon,
DeleteDamn, Man! Well, hey you've surely got me beat by a long shot there, but at least you are honest about it so much appreciated!
I am familiar with all these different theories. They are all bs though and very dangerous. A weak immune system is not the cause but a symptom of these STD's and viruses. Ever caught a cold? Ever transmitted that cold to your partner / family member what-have-you? There goes your whole "terrain theory"! You can have the best diet in the world, it will not protect you against STD'S, when having intercourse with an infected person. The best case scenario in that case would be, if the virus would stay latent as long as your immune system stays strong. Stupid people would take that as an argument against the existence of STD's. However, all it would take is another infection, lack of sleep, stress, aging etc. that would weaken your immune system for the virus / infection to break out and to then show it specific symptoms. A lot of people carry STD's and other infections without even knowing it, getting symtomps only very late in life, when their immun system naturally becomes weaker. This is usually the case for men with a very strong immune system. STD's are as old as mankind and within ancient civilizations, who had way better diets we have today, most STD's were even fatal.
DeleteRegarding your last statement about life and women:
I don't concern myself with saving "this place" (existence), neither with destroying it, because it will destroy itself anyways, due to the 2nd law of Thermodynamics. So there is nothing to be "saved" in the grand scheme of things anyways. However, I concern myself with reducing suffering - personally and thus also collectively - as I am not willing or able to exit this place via suicide for now and so I am forced to interact and live within this existence. I also still care for white people like me!
Eliminating women is a very dumb, emotional and childish statement! Sounds like emotional beta-male rage to me. No, we have to enslave them, as we used to. Stripping them of all rights. Making them property again and removing them from public life. Using them for sex, reproduction and housework, as this is their actual biological and psychological design. By eliminating them you would only suffer, because you need their bodies to please your sexual urges and to stay psychologically and physically healthy. The problem for this to happen, however, is the beta male. He is in the majority and willing to protect and provide for women under all costs. He is willing to fight us to death, instead of ruling over the female, thus we must eliminate all beta-males!
So as long as you can't build a bomb that has the capability to destroy this world once and for all, I would suggest you either a.) exist this place indivdually ( I don't mean this in a mean spirit) or b.) work on the reestablishment of the patriarchy.