Why I'm Actually Looking Forward [Mostly] To the Extinction Of White People
Step by Step, As Time Marches on, Whites are Demonstrating themselves to no longer hold the privilege or title of Civilizing and Conquering the world.
It is with a mixture of both sadness that I state such words, but also even more so actually Anger which overshadows my sadness, because Whites actually DO deserve this fate for everything they have done, and what they continue to do, and how they have been behaving.
It's not a mystery as to why the White Race is "failing" on every level compared to other Races, and no, the birth rate has virtually NO effect on an overall scale as to why they have become such complete and utter failures.
World War II was ABSOLUTELY the most pivotal and defining moment for the Future of Caucasian Peoples and their Culture, in MANY more ways than World War I alone has been.
With the end of World War II, we saw the prevalence of the Boomers "reshaping" the culture that came after it, and we saw no Peace or Prosperity, but we instead saw a world that the Boomers inherited, and have also completely gutted and destroyed for everyone while trying to maximize their own benefits at everyone else's expense.
And we see the response that White people took, especially the Allied Nations in particular in trying to stop Germany, but then also, after the War, how they celebrated the downfall of Germany, Europe and basically anything to do with Caucasian Culture, and that we've been living under a never-ending assault of passing Laws, Policies and Measures that empower other Races at the expense of our own kind.
The Irish / Celts have also been extremely elemental into the wholesale destruction of White People, yet for some reason, people love the Celts and the Irish. Celtic people have absolutely been the true scum of the Earth, and they are in some many ways even worse than the English, but two of them are both partners in crime in the same degeneracy they both spread.
Look at what Goatis is going through, for example. The majority of people against him are overwhelmingly of Celtic Ancestry, and that is no accident. They are known for destroying Europeans and the Celtic Race is actually NOT of European Origin, even though they have been predominant and vast throughout Europe for the longest time.
Both Emily Henderson and Jake Gibson are Celtic Trash.
The only difference between the English and the Irish, is that the English have consequentially destroyed Europe and the West, because of their arrogance and pride, but the Celts actually view the destruction of Caucasians as a "sport".
The English did at least get one thing right when they cited the dangers of the Celtic Races and how they were a danger to civilization and order, and how they are a bunch of liars, drunks, thieves and criminals.
But the English also are a type of liar as well, albeit in the name of maintaining their model of Imperialism.
Europe may have had many Wars and civil conflicts between various races, but no other race besides Jews, Celts (Which are the other Tribe of Jews), English and Norman have been as elemental in utterly destroying all European Races, completely imperiling them in a fashion that other Races have no history in doing, even to their foes.
Even in a country like America, which "inherently" was supposed to be English by Race, with some superficial sprinklings of the French and Scandinavians, when I travel anywhere in this country these days, the PREDOMINANT factor I see of who are deemed "White Americans" are actually people of Celtic Ancestry everywhere.
All of the "Migration Waves" which later opened up to all European Nations after the founding of America which have come here, all of their families have long whittled away and their neighborhoods have become run-down and turned into Ghettos and now are owned by other Immigrants.
Let's be real here. Whites have been on an endless tirade and suicide mission for their people in everything they have done since the time of World War II ending, which never actually "officially" ended the way a War typically ends, it had to do with Germany running out of the ability to continue the war and the Japanese surrender.
And surely, Whites have been committing all kinds of many atrocities against their own kind for a long time, and I do not consider culling of useless eaters or people including the deformed to be an atrocity. We are talking about people who others had no business in destroying their lives. But yet, this is what White people repeatedly do, often times even employing Religious Superstition to justify their "cause".
I really in many ways do look forward to the elimination of the White Race, the only problem is... I'm also not happy with "that" which is intended to replace them, it's a whole other kind of "problem" that we'll be dealing with in the long run of things, along with the lowering of standards from what a normal civilization possesses, if it's to be regarded as "one" in the truest sense.
But I look at White people today, especially the White American, Canadian or British specimen, and there is no doubt in my mind how FAR these losers are gone, even in way worse shape mentally, physically and nearly on every category of their existence compared to someone in Europe, but even against the entire group of other races on Earth.
With what I see that Whites are doing today, there is absolutely no doubt in my mind that they have basically foregone their rights to even exist as a people, whether or not they do the obvious "deed" required to continue the species.
The other factor about something here, of which I see is rarely reflected in Modern Western Philosophy, is the fact that something that ought not to exist, if something has played itself out or demonstrated itself not worthy of existence, should not be allowed to remain alive or prosper. It should either agree to remove itself from existence, or have it removed by others.
"The Irish / Celts have also been extremely elemental into the wholesale destruction of White People, yet for some reason, people love the Celts and the Irish. Celtic people have absolutely been the true scum of the Earth, and they are in some many ways even worse than the English, but two of them are both partners in crime in the same degeneracy they both spread."
ReplyDeleteBoth the Irish and the English are lying, deceitful, manipulative scum. I've had several Irish female managers and they were all evil trash, all of them were loud, obnoxious, disrespectful, pro-feminism, pro-multiculturalism e.t.c.
Funny thing is that on quora.com, I came across posts made by some British guy who claims to be a high ranking freemason, he claims that the British are the lost tribes of Israel and that the Celts had the most 'advanced culture' just after Greece and Rome; which is nonsense. He also claims that the jews have nothing to do with the NWO, even though there is a mountain of evidence to the contrary.
"And surely, Whites have been committing all kinds of many atrocities against their own kind for a long time"
Christianity has been an absolute disaster, it fragmented into several denominations who all claim to be the only correct religion. While in reality, they are all just jew worshippers and their religion is nothing more than judaism mixed with paganism. Before Christianity, Europeans never had wars over religious matters.
@Alex,
DeleteOH YES! The Irish are always obsessed with promoting Multiculturalism, LGBTQ rights, Illegal Immigration, Marijuana use and promoting Race-mixing and many were big pioneers in the Civil Rights Movement. Irish are absolute putrid scum, along with the Scots or any Celtic peoples, wherever they come from, even outside of Europe.
Celts are some of the biggest backstabbing, lying, degenerate, obnoxious pieces of refuse I've ever encountered, many Celtic Women are "Practicing Witches" and they are big-time gossipers and two-faced daughters of the devil. Indeed, very Pro-Feminist and they hate Men and love controlling Men.
Yes, the british are indeed from the Lost Tribes of Israel, but looks like whomever that guy is you are talking about found a "clever" Fairytale to spin off of it, that definitely doesn't surprise me.
Also British are stereotypically in denial about their country and Monarchy's role in controlling the United States and even Foreign Policy, and also definitely have heard from many who deny Britain's role in the NWO.
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteBritain is a bit too obvious. You also have Switzerland, the Netherlands, Russia and of course the USA as important Illuminati centres, as well as France leading the NATO attack on Libya. That's before you even consider the role of Brussels.
DeleteI'm just curious as to why you think the big Prussian/Bavarian land-owners being Grand Orient freemasons is not relevant, and everything is all just about Britain. Obviously Britain is part of it, but just one part.
To be fair the English did protest heavily against the war in Iraq, while Americans tend to be extremely gung-ho about that sort of thing, and are completely lacking in self-criticism when it comes to foreign policy.
War-mongering is not actually popular with the English people. They just don't now how to actually stop it. Precisely because it's organised through international networks.
@martin,
DeleteSwitzlerland, Belgium, Netherlands and France even to some extent Germany may also be key centers of NWO operations, but these countries are less centralized in the process and serve more as "offshoots" as they have for centuries.
Russia, is NOT in particular a key area of strategic interest for NWO activity, although it is an active NWO player. There are many reasons for that.
Britain has been the epicenter of all kinds of influences geared at the NWO and even serving as the Model for many of the Political processes that have been under way in the Modern World, far more than any other Empire since the fall of Rome. The only difference is that Britain conceals its dirty deeds by having "America" be its dog to carry out the majority of the dirty work.
Let's not forget that England created the Balfour Declaration, and that the Federal Reserve System which enslaves the world by its practices in the way it does, is modeled precisely on the "Bank of England", and that they came up with the notion of "Fractional Reserve Banking" as a way to swindle people without making it so obvious to most.
America's Wars and Political Decisions have always been dictated and governed by England, even immediately after the "American Revolution", since the American Revolution was funded on both sides and used as a "façade".
9/11 and the Destruction of the Towers was carried out by a combination of Factions within London and the Vatican, and they also created the Blueprints to use America as their "dog" to start the Wars in Afghanistan and Iraq over it.
Many of the matters concerning energy like with Oil Companies and the Rothschild's Dynasty, also largely are centered around what comes out of London. America today while not paying royalties directly to England in the way that countries like Canada or Australia might, a whole handful of American Companies and Cartels which were quietly gobbled up by British Companies, Americans or anyone who buys from these companies unknowingly pays royalties that are priced into these products that are purchased.
Interesting…., actually I heard Irish Catholics are the only European group in the USA who vote solidly dem.
ReplyDeleteI actually don’t get the Ireland hype, I think Americans reallyyyyy over hype it, which just shows how disconnected they are from their roots, or that they are willing to make up stuff about their background to feel better about themselves .
Any place in the British isles- based on my experience literally living in a ‘Celtic’ country for two years, just seems like a very boring depressing place. Also I don’t want to make this sound like I was doing something to make them treat me a certain way, but I felt I always had eyes on my back, and sometimes people there were often seemed judgmental or passive aggressive. Now obviously there are exceptions, but i felt that feeling way too much. I also never felt like I could be one of them- which, fair enough maybe that’s just because I’m a foreigner and how all foreigners feel like, but for example when I was in Italy I made a friend there, and With him and even his family I never felt so ‘other’ to them and I felt a lot more comfortable with them.
British people also have a huge junkie problem which is a lower class of British people who tend to do drugs, be very vulgar, aggressive and engage in crimes, and you can kinda sense that personality linger in some people you meet, and there are a lot of them in the city center
Now, obviously on some level you can find exceptions or something good about it- but I can’t see anything they have that any other culture couldn’t trump, and it’s certainly a pity seeing this tiny place write the destiny for the entirety of Europe.
That's because you have the very limited perspective of somebody without long-standing connections to Europe. Mainland Europeans are capable of all sorts of vile behaviour.
DeleteAnyway, the English voters rejected Brussels, which is where the policies are enforced from. That's why Croatia has LGBT in the school system now, not because English people are telling them to. I think you need to study the overall system in a bit more depth.
Americans try to blame their behaviour on England won't work either. Everyone knows that American culture is uniquely dogsh*t beyond anything else in the known history of the galaxy.
@T345. Yes, that is correct, basically the whole British Isles is properly "Celtic", even though not geo-politically correct to state, afterall, the land of those Islands has often been referred to historically as "Hibernia". The Anglo-Saxons were never part of "Hibernia" and had come to colonize it, the Anglo-Saxons are a mixture of Germanic Tribes.
DeleteAmerica, Ironically, is also a "Celtic" Country, or at least has effectively became one, and I have illustrated this in articles back from the Wordpress days, because the ironies always add up from America's Colonial Days, which were in fact predominantly English and Dutch, but when we look at George Washington's Continental Army, over half of his soldiers were of Celtic Descent and they were the most aggressive and determined ones to be elemental in staging the American Revolution against England.
Not that "England" wasn't a problem for these Newcomer "English Colonists". but when you look at the trivial details of things and also how the Ulster Scots gained Establishment Currency even over the English after time in this country, it really shines a different light over its muddled history.
Even the genetic makeup changes in both English people in England and America today, if you performed Ancestry test on them, you would find they are half or a quarter "English" in many cases, particularly with Admixtures of Celtic and Norman ancestry.
I know of a Pure Englishman versus a "British person" as we call them, and I even find very few people of Pure English ancestry these days, for whatever that's worth.
In America's early days, many of the Founders and early Pioneers had Pure English Ancestry, and this is why if you look at America today, its forms of politics, understanding about Constitutional Law and so forth, you find that the Modern so-called "Americans" don't even share any spirit or principles as the early Anglo-American Colonizers / Settlers, who did not like the idea of a Big Government and Interfering with other Nations. That influence / change came much more when the Celts had gained establishment within the American system, unaware to many, but it also happened very quickly after the American Revolution.
And to add more twisted ironies, the American Revolution would have never happened, and there would never have been a properly organized Military Force to stage it if it had not been from some "special" Prussian Officer.
"America, Ironically, is also a "Celtic" Country, or at least has effectively became one, and I have illustrated this in articles back from the Wordpress days, because the ironies always add up from America's Colonial Days, which were in fact predominantly English and Dutch"
DeleteIndeed, it seems that it was the pure English (who were originally from a mixture of Germanic tribes) and Germans from Germany who made up the majority of the population in the US at the very beginning. Then it seems that Celts from England (who had adopted English names) and Celts from Ireland, migrated to the US and changed the demographics to their favor.
The founders of the US should have been more careful what races they allowed to live amongst them, they were too tolerant and allowed hostile elements to enter the country such as Celts, Jews, South Italians (who are mostly Middle Easterners with Italian names); and now the country is ruined...
Another scummy race are the Iberians, I've met several south Americans; both light and brown skinned, and none of them were trustworthy people. Actually from the ones I've met, the light skinned ones who had little to no Amerindian admixture were even worse than the dark skinned brown ones. They were liars, backstabbers and boot lickers...
@Alex,
DeleteAbsolutely, and I'm glad to see you also know the history of the Iberians, because they are absolutely savage, and you can see that DNA in how it has translated down into the aggressive nature of many South Americans.
The phenomenon you speak of on the Admixtures, this is true. Although historically even through Caste systems or through the notion of maintaining racial purity, which IS an ideal thing, the overwhelming factor has typically been those with the Lightest Skin or least Admixture of "others" to be seen as the most civilized or "decent" members of society, but in actuality it is more of a perception than reality, depending on factors behind the race.
It is never an actual "indicator" of who they are as a people and the level of how savage they are. Some American Indian tribes were "better" peoples than others, irrespective of their skin darkness.
What makes the very troublesome issue with the Conquistadors for example, is the fact that the overwhelming stock of them, had Sephardic Jewish Ancestry of note, and so they were all heavily "in-bred" to begin with from particular families who were thrown out of Spain and Portugal during the Inquisition. A lot of them carried with them this Iberian Heritage, which also included a very aggressive and savage people known as the "Basques".
So this ancestry when mixed with American Indian tribes which could be or may be "less" savage, created even more complications in the mix of either various forms of racism and tribal conflicts from these Colonizers, and for better or worse, has also planted a seed of "general dislike" for White people among most Brown-skinned American Indians.
The Colonizers of South America were extremely aggressive, very opportunistic and embarked on raping the Natives in the literal sense, without care of mixing their blood, probably because they know inherently that these Nations are all artificial creations which were "forced" against the Natives, and that they probably idealized that it's better having "half-breeds" of themselves with the Colonialist DNA than none at all. At least that is how they "think".
When it comes to the colorization of races, I believe the world perception has been more predicated based on the fear of it correlating to the level of "Negro" DNA, which would likely hold more reality to the degree a race could be savage or with significantly lower IQ, this is even a prevalent fear for a long time in India with their caste system, although maybe right in some regard because the Indian Race is mixed with Negroes, but as such, some races which have darker skin are not inherently mixed with Negroes, such as the case with American Indian peoples, who are actually an Oriental Race.
"Although historically even through Caste systems or through the notion of maintaining racial purity, which IS an ideal thing, the overwhelming factor has typically been those with the Lightest Skin or least Admixture of "others" to be seen as the most civilized or "decent" members of society, but in actuality it is more of a perception than reality, depending on factors behind the race."
DeleteThe majority of the time, the lighter skinned higher castes are more intelligent, better looking, better behaved e.t.c. The lighter skinned Central and South Americans are the exception to this rule, since the Iberians who colonized those areas even though were lighter skinned, were already mixed with Jews and Moors from north Africa who controlled Spain for centuries; that admixture resulted in a violent, lower IQ population. The Germanic Visigoths ruled Spain for some time, but they were a small minority of the population and didn't change the demographics of the country.
"A lot of them carried with them this Iberian Heritage, which also included a very aggressive and savage people known as the "Basques"."
Incidentally, the founder of the Jesuits was a man called Ignatius of Loyola. Some sources claim he was of Basque descent. The Jesuits seem to be involved in the NWO, together with the freemasons and the Jews.
Yes, it looks like the Knights Templar (later absorbed into the Knights of Malta) worked with Sephardic Jewish merchants from the very beginning, if they were not directly founded by them. This is where the CityUK, Swiss bankers, Singapore, Grand Orient mason, and major German landowners and Zionist Jews intersect in one place.
DeleteSure, it makes total sense, and also explains why the BMW Klatten family were involved in developing Covid testing technology and the conspiracy to poison their own people. The same hierarchy, they just don't like talking to the NYC Jewish press because they are always looking for ways to sue them, or libel them etc.
They're still not one of us, sadly.
Interesting…, pretty sure Pablo Escobar came from an inbred Basque community in Colombia, and you know how that ended…
DeleteActually, the most btches awful girls I’ve met, was this one girl who moved to our school from colombia(she didn’t look native), and this other girl who I believe was mixed Central American & Afro, then I’ve also recently had a problematic experience with one Mexican girl at my work who seemed to target me, when I got along fine with everyone else there.
The Colombian girl happened back in middle school, she already looked fully developed at 12 while most other girls our age were still skinny and young looking.
She was always trying to get attention from guys and the wrong type of guys too, and she even tried to trip me when I was walking(I saw her foot out) like one of those classic bullies. The bchiness radiated off of her and she was completely obvious about it and entitled asf for acting like this when she’s new.
The other mixed girl who before she was even on my radar, apparently started trash talking me, and down to my name being ugly even tho I have a pretty normal sounding name, while hers was some weird French one. She always treated me like a stereotypical bully, and would not respond to me when I talked to her. But then out of no where call me bestie and act all fake nice around me one day.
The coworker also did this, she seemed to be judging the hell out of me and talked to me condescendingly from the beginning. She even went immediately to my boss to complain about me not being confident enough or not knowing something when she was training me, almost to get me in trouble…
"and she even tried to trip me when I was walking(I saw her foot out) like one of those classic bullies. The bchiness radiated off of her and she was completely obvious about it and entitled asf for acting like this when she’s new."
ReplyDeleteI've met several Colombians and they are absolute scum. The majority of them are extremely rude, disrespectful, obnoxious, backstabbing, boot lickers. It's funny how they are so arrogant when their country is such a hellhole and instead of having some humility, they come to the West and cause problems...
@T345 & Alex,
DeleteYes, some colombians can be brutal and ruthless like that. There are some which will even unalive someone for only a quarter. Not even joking by that statement either.
In terms of Specimens I've met from Latin America, I have met a better share of people from Chile and even Ecuador, but those from Ecuador tend to be overly "dark" which is common among them, and you can see from their features that they have less Spanish admixtures. I've met some very good Brazilians in times past, however Brazilians are also not explicitly one people either. In so many ways. While predominantly from Portuguese Ancestry, there are many Italian, even some with German or mixed ancestry as that in or from Brazil. They have an extremely varied background, ethnic-wise.
But I would say in terms of maybe the large majority of Latin-Americans I have met or interacted with for any reason, people from Ecuador seem to be very naturally friendly and not "fake", very warm, open-minded people, very curious about other people and cultures. I've had the least bad experiences with them, and while it may be subjective on my part, it's something I can't help to notice in patterns.
The ancestry of Pure Spaniards is Good European blood, but it's been too contaminated over time, so the issues of what happened even when the Spanish and Portuguese colonized South America, is they brought with them several subject racial admixtures, including Moorish blood, Sephardic blood, as well as the blood of Basques, Celts and other subject races of the Iberian region.
I think you are getting carried away with this extinction. Sure, it is annoying to see the inter marriage and breeding, but ease up a bit. :))).
ReplyDelete