Looking Into Creating A Forum Soon
I am looking soon into creating a "Forum" for our discussions, as this is something I also was hoping to have on the previous website long ago, but never got around to it.
If you have interest in being part of the forum, please be sure to E-mail us, because it will be a Private Forum on behalf of the website.
We are making a mandatory rule, however, in that you must list any names or aliases you use relative to our website here, along with through e-mails or otherwise and provide a first name and your country location, in order to be able to join the forum.
I think it will also make it a much better way that we can also discuss topics that are not necessarily even started or led by me, which is what I would like to have, and for topics that do not necessarily involve anything to do with Prussian Topics, but that still will be a key part in there as well.
rc
I want people to have the ability to start a topic about anything they want, which might not even be on my own radar, and to have the chances of meeting other like minds who also may have some input or knowledge or a new perspective on something.
I would like to grow the forum to also incorporate others who have interests that span over the unique type of Spiritual Ascension that many people have reached here, and also people who are naturally attracted and interested in everything to do with the Occult, Gnosticism, as well as topics relating to anything Misanthropic, Nihilistic, and who believe in Anti-Natalism and are also very passionate.
There will also be features on things like Organic Portals (NPC's) and Demons, etc.
I think this will help a lot more because if a topic becomes "hot", it can take on its own form, instead of being filed or archived away, which is how things run on a blog website like this. Unfortunately because of the "layout" of this blog website, it also makes it hard to sometimes keep track of certain new comments or I miss many more, especially as the topic gets older, and just the way it's organized is really sloppy and difficult to maintain.
So I would like to think it will be much easier to manage on a forum website.
There would be a lot of interaction between highly unique people, and people who love to have discussions about forbidden topics, things that are so absolutely taboo to speak, and yet it will be discussed and entertained on our forums, and I want other such people to be able to meet and interact with others, even if it is unfortunately restricted to only "online".
Such is the nature of our times. But also, keeping in mind, how very few people think or can even operate on the level that we do.
I have surveyed a lot of things in the past, and I generally think that there may be no more than about 20,000 or so people in the world at any given time who think or identify with things we do here.
The large majority of masses in this world would absolutely be horrified to even think that people either think or believe what we do, or have the kinds or morbid curiosities of things we do.
As always, I like to also keep a very "open" and unfolded environment, so I keep rules very minimal, I do not like to censor others or control the flow of information, and rather let things fall where they may, and I also allow others to have verbal arguments with others if they so wish, as would also happen in the natural world.
The only main thing that I choose to block out are Trolls and Spammers, for obvious reasons.
But otherwise, it's not our job to insist that others must "play nice", even if they disagree with me, they also have the right to disagree with me or be upset by something I say. I don't hold it against anyone personally if they do, it's just human nature, plus none of us will ever agree 100% with someone's beliefs on everything at all times.
It's no reason to hold anything against them.
It's interesting how much people hardly realize how much of an "un-free" world they live in, especially online, since most Social Media Channels, Outlets, even Forum, have Owners or Moderators that heavily police everyone and even over the stupidest things, and make them behave. A lot of times, Moderators are abusive, and they will even insist a person who has a just cause to "knock things off" or else risk being banned permanently from the channel. It's really pathetic. Often times, Moderators will allow the most putrid scum to even remain part of Channels and Forums. I've seen it for many years.
I think it's the gayest shit ever, and nearly all parts of the Internet are like that, where someone gets easily offended and then they want to ban you for the dumbest things.
The only thing of course though is that the Forums usually have some strict rules or guidelines of their own, so if you have to ask something that the Forum Host doesn't allow, I would recommend using a method of reversing your text or whatever other ways to "disguise it" from the algorithms.
Being creative is really the best way.
I also want to have a Music section where we can all post and share some really bad-ass music.
I'll keep everyone more informed of that of course, as time moves on, once it gets going.
But I will announce once I have this all setup and figured out, but just be sure to contact us in the meantime so I can add you to the list to join.
Thank you.
I saw this today on the Julius Evola Telegram channel. Perhaps he reads your blog. I thought I would share. The concept of Absolute Sovereign, of a Metaphysical origin - I found it touching:
ReplyDeleteThe true aristocratic spirit cannot have any traits in common with Machiavellian and demagogical forms of dominion, as occurred for instance in the ancient popular tyrannies and in the plebeian tribunals. Nor can it take as its basis the theory of the ‘overman’, if one thinks of this overman only as a power resting on the purely individual and naturalistic qualities of violent and fearful figures. In its deepest principle, the substance of the aristocratic spirit is rather ‘Olympian’; we have already said that it derives from a metaphysical order.
The basis of the aristocratic type is above all spiritual. The meaning of spirituality here has however little to do with the modern notion of spirituality: it is connected to an innate sense of sovereignty, to a disdain for profane, common, purchasable things, or anything born from ability, ingenuity, erudition or even genius—a disdain which closely resembles that of professed by the ascetic, differentiating itself from it however by its complete absence of pathos and resentment. One might state the essence of the true noble nature in this formula: superiority over that life which has become nature or race.
- Julius Evola
@Olympic Virility,
DeleteActually who is this Julius Evola Telegram Channel?
Let them say what they shall, Machiavelli was a genius and one of the biggest figures I admire in history. I almost feel as if I knew him in a past life.
A true aristocratic order, in an idealized society, would not be founded upon soulless financial relations, technocratic abominations, or brutal coercion. Followers, too, can be noble. And recognizing the nobility in another, bonds of open-hearted hierarchy and organic Natural power structures begin to take shape.
DeleteLoyalty not extracted, but freely given, a feeling of unity without limit - Metaphysical Unity and Origin in the Ideal… Fatherland. Transcendence
@Olympic Virility...
DeleteYeah... In an "idealized society"... That's correct. But we don't live in an idealized society.
Therefore, a Prussian will have to respond accordingly. If you catch my drift.
I believe he has a Twitter channel, should you like to inquire of him? It’s an anonymous channel, for the most part.
DeleteI say this not to deride Machiavelli - I read The Prince and his commentaries on the Ancients back in college days; I too saw his thinking as self-evident, and recognized an affinity with his thinking, which is essentially Realpolitik and a fundamental recognition of the All-To-Human nature of most people, especially the warring Italian fractious city-states.
But I have also read Friedrich der Große‘ “Anti-Machiavelli”, and I think both perspectives have their merit, and are correct.
Whereas a top-down cold domination and manipulation of the governed populace may he necessary for certain peoples, I think that a Superior form of government is one in which everyone is Naturally of like mind and united in Spirit, as the Germans and Prussians were, and in which every Man at every step of the Hierarchy unsheathes his sword and salutes, pledging allegiance willingly and gladly to his Superiors in High Command. Such nobility can only be expected of a cultured and well-bred Master Race…
The “biggest brain” book I have ever (only halfway) read was Vom Krieg… I swear I was having so many revelations and connecting so many dots on the fundamental essence of things, each page took me 5-10 minutes.
@Olympic Virility,
DeleteI can see from a certain standpoint why some people or even staunch Moralists may view Machiavelli through a negative lens. Particularly because his views come from a much more cut-throat view and approach to everything Political, down to Leadership, Government and Society. But Machiavelli's philosophies are very difficult to deny, and it comes down to what is very much a form of utilizing cold hard reason.
Machiavelli is one of my favorite Italian figures of all time.
Even in the way Bismarck conducted policies, Machiavellianism was utilized when and where necessary. It is why Bismarck is also one of my favorite figures. I like Men who have brutal and ruthless personalities. They make great, effective leaders.
Absolutely! I actually think that the Feudal Overlords in their Castles did not do enough to clamp down on the slave-peasants running away and forming these materialistic libertine city-states in rebellion, causi ng havoc and bringing about the inversion of everything in the Modern World via Money-Corruption and Liberal-Democracy
DeleteSure, the Medieval Christian dogmatism was a bad system. But what we essentially saw was the overpopulation by the lesser elements of the people… The Medieval regime wasn’t harsh or dynamic enough, I think, in retrospect. The erosion of Patriarchy and Eugenic breeding at large led to a terrible, perhaps fatal decline we see now.
Maybe such a state of affairs could only be a dream… Overseeing Civilization in an Eugenic fashion requires truly Enlightened and Futuristic, Capable Leaders
@Olympic Virility,
DeleteRight on. I would love to say that Germans or German history was only composed of our people being nothing but "Angels", but we have endured many centuries of conflicts and even very distasteful elements from time to time which have even emerged from certain tribes of our own people, and which also made the Reich have to govern them all a certain way, because of very different mindsets and attitudes of some Germans. We Germans are still a very young race, even in comparison to many more Ancient Races that still roam the earth, and I still view the German race as nowhere near the level of development it had needed to achieve to be on the level of the Romans.
Well, if you aren’t brutal and ruthless in the defense of yourself and your Dominion, of everything sacred, could you even be considered a true leader? Haha, I never considered Machiavelli to be incorrect or in bad taste. Cold Hard Reason and Power Politics; Political Reality. That would be like saying that eating Raw Meat is in “bad taste” or “morally reprehensible”. : ) Only a liar or coward could believe such nonsense. Machiavelli was straight as a laser.
DeleteI think that the Machiavellianism and Bismarck-ean approach becomes more necessary when dealing with uniting and establishing order amongst disparate groups at home and amongst highly competitive and dynamic regional powers surrounding you. Then, in War, there is no time for luxuries such as higher “Ideals” or such humanistic nonsense. Animals and the Masses only understand and respect: Force
And this grand politics, the struggle for survival and German Unification under Bismarck was another such tumultuous time. But I believe that the unprecedented Unity and Style of Leadership that Frederick the Great and Adolf Hitler’s Third Reich represented, a Solar, Positive Unity - this is True Greatness. This is Unlimited
When all forces align as One; the Intensity is Exponential
There is no more room for “dialectics” because power is solidified at home, and the policy abroad is Total War: expanding in all directions, like Sunshine.
That style, I see, as being Higher, Nobler, More Powerful - Ultimately, and more Mature
DeleteEven though, Machiavelli and Bismarck represent the Actual Reality, the High-Pressure stakes Law of the Jungle fight for Survival in a cutthroat world.
DeleteIn one of House of History’s videos on the Silesian Wars, I believe, he recounts how Prussia stripped bare Saxony’s wealth after they allied with Austria, taking everything for the war effort, even the church bells. And they were Victorious…
So rewarding, as always, to learn from you, Prussian. Thank you.
@Olympic Virility, A true statement about the Feudal Overlords. The thing that is crucial to remember about them, particularly as it concerns European History, is that most rulers who governed a population, "viewed" them a certain way, but not from a standpoint of them belong to their own people. Many rulers viewed there people from a lens of trying to micro-manage them on a certain basis that would usually be robotic, and also to try to keep them on a certain level playing field to keep the most bare-bone type of existence available to them. This is even evident in the fact that even for much of human history, that "peasants" have been kept on grains and vegetables, and only would get meat as an occasional "treat", or it would be scraps or bits of meat when available, or as capable of being hunted. Depending on where one lived.
DeleteHistorically, almost all Monarchies and Rulers actually lived very "detached" on a realistic basis with how the living conditions of their own people were, compared to daily lives of Royals.
Europe's climate made everything even all that much worse.
Sura
ReplyDeleteShould be a good idea to start this.
ReplyDeleteIt is important to vent. To express ideas. To elevate the thinking.
Do you have another link. I can't get in. My email is lookmattdamon@outlook.com. Thanks. -Matt Damon.
ReplyDelete@Joey Aragon, Thanks, I've got it listed.
DeleteSent
Delete@Charlote, Received, Thank you.
DeleteIs this how u want women to treat you @PSA? https://www.tiktok.com/@harmonycamden/video/7446783350674689312
ReplyDeleteSure, why not?
DeleteThat woman is just another opportunistic bitch. That guy was smarter than her by not responding. That is the correct way to live, for men these days. Especially in public.
ReplyDelete@Prussian I sent you an email. Mine is j.eston870@gmail.com - John Eston
ReplyDelete@PSA
Delete