Bjorn is just "too blind" to see the Forest For The Trees, In His Pro-Natalist Stance

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ii7MCunTt0

It's funny, because you can see the confusion in this Man... On one hand, he basically admits all the failures of our species, and how much suffering and difficulties Humans go through, how people want to isolate further and not want anything to do with one another, but then on another hand, believes that the fight to keep the species alive, or particularly "one's tribe" should be pursued.

The part where he mentioned about "forming tribes", well that already indicates that the Tribes have been weakened, because in a natural setting, you shouldn't need to "form" a tribe. All tribes have been formed from long ago, and you should only need to be born into them, not to "form" them.

The part where he mentions about how our ancestors survived famines, wars, ice ages and so on, well, the thing is not everybody is "equal", and his viewpoints overlook the fact that the chances are very high that all of these survivors through human tragedies and hardships, had very likely had to "adapt" in order to survive.

Another thing Bjorn and many people probably also do not understand, is that actually from the beginning of time through Warfare, the BEST and BRIGHTEST and INNOCENT members of any Race are always the first to be targeted for persecution or to be slaughtered, enslaved or destroyed, meaning that every new War or Conflict means that there will be less and less Spirited, Quality beings recycling into the genetic pool as new generations are born.

And I have often explained how ALL forms of adaptations are weaknesses, because they are, and this may often render itself in the form of the most undesirable types of specimens who were obsessed with survival to a point where they carried on their genes more so than others.

Look at the state around you in the world today. There are not many good people in the world, so it can't just be some sort of abstract coincidence that most people do not want to associate with other people in Modern society.

In fact, when the Populations were smaller, under 2 Billion, there were FAR more plentiful good people to find then, compared to now in a population of just over 8 Billion at this time.

This fact ALWAYS gets overlooked by Pro-Natalists who wish to insist that the world is not as bad as it used to be.

But the fact is that, it is not just Western Nations which have the birth rate decline and where younger people especially do not want children. Countries like China, India, or even African Nations which are known for having some of the highest birth rates, also have increasing Anti-Natalism and less desire to procreate, with falling birth rates compared to years ago.

Former generations never knew of overpopulation.

One thing I will admit though, as much as I am against Feminism and everything to do with Women's opinions, is that Women are correct (even if by accident) in the notion when they claim that Women don't owe Men any children.

And this is a justifiable claim, because the thing is, having a child is a privilege, not a right, and the thing is that it is a type of decision that a couple must make "mutually", so the thing is that even in a most ideal Patriarchal society, just as much as I also have held the view that Men should not be able to monopolize access to Women by the means of prostitution or flaunting wealth and that he must be subjected to the "whims" of Natural Selection, so too would be the case in terms of how the approach is for children, because the thing is it is technically not a right for any Woman to be mandated to bear offspring with a Man.

And unfortunately, as usual, it will always be the worst type of Men who insist that these things be a right, because the actual Men who are most obsessed with Women being baby producing machines, has a lot more to do with Men wanting to use those children to obtain or establish power, particularly through social obligations such as raising or employing children, rather than gaining power innately.

So they will always be the worst type of father figures in any given society.

In fact, you may not actually believe this, or want to believe it, but did you know that actual Criminal Men have a much higher drive to insist on Protecting and Providing for Women, along with the desire to impregnate Women?

Specifically, much more so, over Men who are "morally-minded" if I were to put it that way, or Men who are not geared towards criminality in general.

The reproductive desire, success and fertility rates in such Men, are far higher than Non-Criminal Men.

And at the same time, Women who are programmed to "respond" to such type of Men in a positive Manner, often end up selecting those type of Men specifically, since NPC's are programmed very distinctly to propagate their own gene pools over others, even more so than Demonic Humans!

This is why you always find an ample supply of these people and breeding so many children left and right.

Research it if you don't believe me.

And then decide for yourself whether you think this could be possibly a world worth bringing more people in, and to have your children assimilate into that madness!?

The chances that a Man who is maybe not Anti-Natalist as such, but AT LEAST perhaps "indifferent" to the notion of having children being a better Man overall, is EXTREMELY high and favorable in comparison to a Man who insists that his girlfriend or wife must give him children.

The funny thing though when I listen to people like Bjorn or anyone who is concerned with supporting this world, is that I always hear their words they speak through the pathway of the fact that they believe only what they do, and this way because it is the only experience or knowledge of "life" and "living" that they know of, coupled with their biological impulses.

Because before they were born, or even as they were growing up as a toddler, they would never have known these things or had any concern with them.

In fact, if a child grew up in total isolation and confinement, and then suddenly at a certain age as an adult was exposed to the world with no explanation or acclimation to it, they would immediately see and experience how harsh, brutal and senseless the world is, and would not care to be a part of it or be more involved with it in any way.

For all we know, once we exit these flesh bodies, there is likely to be a sense of resentment towards anything to do with marveling over life, existence and trying to propagate the species and continue our bloodlines on this Earth, and from my understanding from many Medical workers who have witnessed the death of patients, that there has been expressions of relief in their last moments to be out of here and out of this body, even remarks about why they spent their whole lives working so hard.

There really is no point trying to save or empower this existence on any level, not even for our own Tribes, since our only goal at this point should be to focus on ascension and never coming back to this wretched place.

At this point in time, it's long past overdue to just consider giving up everything to do with life.

And even the most proud, staunchest individuals very soon will be forced to have to recognize this truth, even if it makes themselves very uncomfortable and full of malaise or bad thoughts and depression.

But the truth is that, there is really not much of anything left to maintain any sincere kind of interest in this world, and that I believe a mature and thoughtful mind would want to know or gamble with what may exist beyond this, or to prefer to just even be living at all, as an alternative to this existence.

Bjorn, like most NPCs, probably clings to the delusional notion or idea, that everything to do with Life is "cyclical" and that eventually things will somehow miraculously correct themselves to the right way at some point sooner or later. But he is gravely out of touch with reality.

Another thing I think that was really cringey and so un-original of him, is the fact that he tried to piggyback the trending tagline that "Having children / Building a Family in 2026 is the ultimate rebellion."

This has become a very trendy statement by Pro-Natalists, and the statement is designed to sound edgy but basically short-circuits any true logic or the decision, nor empathy for what the children will have to endure in the world to come.

It's insane, and actually very passive, to believe that parents who refused to fight for better conditions in the world or to revolve against Tyrants and Unfair Expenses and Corruption in society, will instead relegate he notion of that rebellion taking place by having more children.

Then again, types like Bjorn also believe in "peaceful resistance" and not resorting to violence, which shows just how much even Christianity has made pacifists out of the Vikings like him.

Refusing to fix problems in society but yet willingly bringing children here, is morally corrupt and wicked, and it means that Humans have lost a sense of any moral obligation to bring forth future generations of people because you did not do anything to raise the standard of living for them entering the world.

Not that this world is worth fighting for, but it also makes you wonder if on a subconscious level they are keenly aware of that because of the fact that they never chose to get their hands dirty in it.

In reality, the children that someone like Bjorn envisions to be born as an "act of rebellion", will in fact only materialize to be future populations of screen starers, as their form of destiny.