A Comment Some Girl Made Somewhere Online Proves My Every Point About Women
When I say that literally EVERYTHING associated with being a Man and Masculinity revolves around a Man being a "slave", I never meant it in a limited scope whatsoever, but I mean it by literally every means possible, in that, you are "theoretically" not allowed as a Man, by society, through the perception of Women and other Men, to be doing any activities not aligned with being a Slave, otherwise you are thought of as being "feminine" or "gay" or other words these days like being "sassy" or a "princess".
This comment also proves just how much of a lack of empathy Women have for Men even on the most basic level of actual needs for survival, and it goes back to what I have said that if most Men had any clue what Women routinely think of Men, not only would Men have absolutely NOTHING to do with Women, but Men would start unaliving Women in the streets everywhere.
Notice how the only "two" items that she suggests a Man should be carrying on his person, are strictly and distinctly only associated with you being a Provider and Protector. That is no coincidence.
I bet she would complain about toxic masculinity at the same time...
ReplyDeleteThe only toxic masculinity is what she's promomting, where you feel vulnerable being urself or acting a certain way as to not seem weak or feminine or vulnerable
Her name is also cringe
this is why ill never work again! hell yeah
ReplyDeleteused to date a girl that frequently called me “sassy”
ReplyDeletewas a badge of honor! sassy men for the win!
I'm certain that with her name she has plenty of 'Based' Simps.
ReplyDeleteAbout 15 years ago, I made a comment about "women are assholes"...and that was something men were not used to hearing about...
ReplyDeleteToday, I think we have come a long way, as men.
Most of us know women are demons and assholes. That is why the men that keep slaving on for women are dangerous as well. It shows how much BS these WEAK men are willing to put up with for a little validation and pussy. Bunch of losers.
Women also just continue to go down on the line on the graph. Women are like Sears or JCP stock. Once proud companies that had respect of the market. Now, are just bankrupt sacks of shit. Even in my own family, so many of these cousins and other family are somewhat wealthy now, having taken advantage of all the great jobs they got or some simp husbands they have taken advantage of. I want nothing to do with any woman, as they are not worth my time or attention. NEVER. And I also do my best to stay away from all married men and men in extended relationships. These are dangerous people to be around, because no matter how long you have had a friendship with a fellow friend (even decades), they will throw you under the bus for a CUN Women T, they have know for only a few weeks. This is true, whether we like to admit it or not.
And then they wonder why guys like Elliot Rodger exist.
ReplyDeleteExactly. Elliot Rodger was just acting on natural instincts.
Delete@Joey Aragon,
DeleteCorrect, Eliot Rodger did act on natural instinct, and he targeted only those who wronged him.
Yeah-seems like she was/is some sort of wannabe 'Simpfluencer' (I just made that up!!) for lonely zoomer Rightoids who apparently never 'took off'
ReplyDeletehttps://rumble.com/v4rg3rr-bronze-age-shawty-the-rise-of-right-wing-social-media-content-and-why-free-.html
She looks exactly as I thought she would
Delete@HUMAN PASTE
DeleteWhy has everything been linking back to Charlie Kirk in some way or another? I genuinely can not escape seeing something about Charlie or Erika Kirk in every waking moment of my life at least a couple times a day.
@zikeKEK,
DeleteI think because Charlie Kirk was another psyop event. While any event could even be just a Conspiracy or another Planned event, they don't always have a psyop behind them, because psyops are designed to psychologically manipulate people and also tie other things into them. The planners who run these events usually also make them multi-faceted and with money-making opportunities behind them, just like COVID or even the Iran War I'd also say. War in and of itself of course is "not" a psyop, but they can be used very much as a Psyop, and the thing with Iran has brought out all kinds of horrible nonsense, even Erika Kirk lately seems to be very politically active and outspoken.
@PSA
DeleteYep, certainly that, but I just find it so random that the link that @HUMAN PASTE sent was a video of Charlie Kirk speaking with the woman that is behind the tweet mentioned in this post. It is the most random thing ever.
I really wonder what's behind this anti-Israel or even you could say anti-Jewish attitude recently from many people, but obviously it's not like these "FREE PALESTINE" leftists actually give a shit about the genocide being done to the Palestinians.
Also been wondering about population recently, That Sv3rige video stating that the Earth's population but it seems incorrect. The Earth's population IS over 1 billion right? I'm sure this video was made with good intentions, but I have a hard time believing that depopulation is a bigger issue than overpopulation.
https://youtu.be/I_rU7O-6Rxo?si=8TnaNx3VWo6Gfbkl
@zikeKEK,
DeleteI agree, that is kinda weird... I still don't even see Charlie Kirk as this phenomenal "Great Man" like the masses and Right Wingers do, I mean if anything he has more negatives than positives, and is not even "neutral", yet the celebration behind him is something that even War Veterans (for better or worse) don't even get in recognition.
Actually, you reminded me of something very important on Sv3rige, because I keep forgetting about it, his "population" video is also one viewpoint I also don't agree with outside of the Natalist views, and I plan on one day getting into that video, but what I almost wonder or want to ask him if he was talking about the "Pure Human Population" not counting the NPC's alive... Because if he meant it from that standpoint, he would be 100% spot-on.
But the population has been CLEARLY increasing, even if we had no knowledge or other ways to verify it, all of us have absolutely seen how much more people, traffic and activity are around us even in the last 10-20 years alone.
So there is no way the Earth's population could be under 1 Billion.
@PSA
DeleteYeah, again Charlie Kirk is not someone I found unique at all, you probably even walk past hundreds of guys a week that are like Charlie Kirk, he really wasn't anything special and he's really just another guy to me, an everyday Joe essentially.
>>Actually, you reminded me of something very important on Sv3rige, because I keep forgetting about it, his "population" video is also one viewpoint I also don't agree with outside of the Natalist views, and I plan on one day getting into that video, but what I almost wonder or want to ask him if he was talking about the "Pure Human Population" not counting the NPC's alive... Because if he meant it from that standpoint, he would be 100% spot-on.<<
I completely understand but the notion of the Earths Pure Human population being "under 1 billion" still implies that there could be hundreds of millions of Pure Humans which I think is incorrect, it's probably just about reaching the 100-200 million mark or simply in the tens of millions.
It appears to me he probably just wants to convince others and others that depopulation is a bigger issue than overpopulation because it ties more into "living naturally" and as another reason to have kids.
I also think he just wants people to have kids either way, because he isn't thinking logically on it because "In Nature" nobody would think logically and they would just reproduce without thinking about it as he said something before about that. That's what I took away from that, and you said before that Sv3rige said that he would still reproduce even in times of war or under inhospitable conditions. And that is because people in Nature just do what they want and don't actually think about it logically and do not have self-control.
@zikeKEK,
DeleteWell stated on that with Charlie Kirk.
Yes I agree that there could not possibly even be many Many Millions of Pure Humans left.
Because some time back, even well before COVID, the actual assessments we had were somewhere around the 600-700 Million Mark, and even in a best case scenario, that would only mean roughly 7-8% of the world population today, and so yeah it probably falls somewhere between maybe 100 - 300 Million or so. COVID also happened, and suicides have also been on the rise and more older people who were not NPC's who are dying out rapidly.
So many Pure Humans must absolutely be committing suicide because there is no way they can cope with this world too well any longer, especially since COVID.
@PSA
DeleteI'm again not entirely sure if I constitute as a Pure Human or not but I can't imagine anything that shows creativity or intelligence would remain in this world. That being said, like I just mentioned, I'm not entirely sure if I'm a Pure Human or not (leaning towards no, but who knows, mostly due to the fact that my parents are NPCs and I'm their offspring) but I'm so sick of the general public.
Let me tell you a recent school story as well
Since I got this new Phone, now everyone is like "Wow Zike you're so cool and awesome because you have a Phone that's new and cool and the latest model ^_^" but WHO GIVES A FUCK, WHY DO YOU SUDDENLY LIKE ME JUST BECAUSE I HAVE A PHONE THAT'S A NEW MODEL AND ALSO JUST NEW IN GENERAL? I don't even know how people recognised the model of the phone just from looking at it as well, I know there are design differences between every Phone but who gives a shit. but yes, suddenly I was popular for a couple minutes because I had a phone that does the exact same thing as every other Phone in the world, but since it's the latest "model" (which I didn't even want) now it's suddenly cool. I would gladly trade in my current phone for an older model. It keeps setting me retarded reminders to set up a face ID and INCONVIENT RETARDED "SECURITY" FEATURES. FUCK THIS IPHONE.
A BUNCH OF SHALLOW FUCKS AROUND ME. I HATE IT.
Its such a shame that most of them aren't good at all.It would be so pleasurable to have my fetish of freeuse be done by them.
ReplyDelete@indeed,
DeleteYep, they are very few and far between. I've only met 3, sort of 4 (but never did anything with them) who were anywhere along the lines of seeing things the way I do especially in bedroom activities where they were actually, truly fun.
Outside of them, I've noticed that not only were all the rest totally BORING but they were extremely "suspicious" types, most Women I've met are extremely negative people and have an attitude against Men in general.
And PSA, I am sure you know by now, that those 3 or 4 we're FAKING it all...just to get something out of you.
DeleteThat is how women operate.
They don't have any original ideas. They just walk around like cons all day long. And just hope and pray that you are not onto their lies.
@Joey Aragon,
DeleteWell, I will say that 2 of them I can absolutely vouch for 100% were thankfully "not" using me because they did contribute back both in the bedroom and out, I will say in all decency those 2 were not fake. One of them was a dominatrix. They were all visual, which means they naturally enjoyed the sex for the sex itself, and didn't see themselves as "giving it to me".
However, 1 of them, the one that I did not take to the bedroom and actually had other suspicions about (who also had been a dominatrix), I found a blog of hers online many years ago that confessed her many years of sleeping with Married Men and other horrible things she wrote in her blogs, and I am thankful my senses did not pursue things further with her. But she could have very well faked a lot of things, especially based on what I learned about her in that blog.
Outside of these situations, every Woman I ever have interacted with, dated or been involved with in some way or another, all of them were fake, and also lazy in bed if we got there.