Proof That Almost "Nobody" Actually Believes In "Grape"

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1GR1vB5eL8

 

 

This is of course a sensitive subject for many, but it's something that should be addressed on a very note.

A lot of what you hear on both sides, doesn't matter whether it is a Male or Female being accused for the so-called crime of "grape", but the truth of the matter is that, "grape" is actually more of a concept or idea programmed based on Laws and Perceptions, rather than Primal or Subconscious beliefs, which would absolutely supersede any kind of notion of "Law".

In fact, the Laws actually exist more as a regulatory framework to inhibit and punish natural selection to some degree, but to create a "threshold" between pre-adults and those who actually embark upon official adulthood.

For example, the so-called "Statutory Grape" which is a joke in and of itself, let's say a boy and girl meet and become a "couple" somewhere between Middle School and High-school, but let's say the boy is 17 and the girl is 14. This is somehow considered "legal", but yet the moment he turns 18 and she is 15, by the books, it suddenly is "no longer legal".

So this means that if we were to follow the Law to every word, when they first got together their relationship was "Legal", and then suddenly for a brief time, it becomes "Illegal".

Laws, as I have stated, are never based on Facts or Truths. They are just agreements or values that are decided upon by a group of people, and have no correlation to Facts.

In the case I present above, say if this boy were 2 years older or if they waited for 2 years, then "suddenly" it's no longer considered Statutory Grape.

That is absolute nonsense! It's actually beyond silly. But the further proof that nobody actually believes in it either, can even be seen from reading the comments, as even Many of the guys are responding that the student is a "LEGEND" and praising him, and how this would be every Teenager's dream, and absolutely it would be! Because we have the primal desires to be with someone we are sexually attracted too.

In fact, the comments are telling from EVERY angle, because what really appears to how the activities were caught onto, had to do with another Male student who was jealous. Once again, a "Male" who wants to eliminate competition and access to other Women, who decided to report it, which was a cowardly action.

Them being a "Teacher" does not make any kind of "difference" or "exception". Only in the minds of Matrix-minded NPC's, does that hold true, because they are "conditioned".

In fact, the whole notion  of "Statutory Grape" is actually ridiculous because it automatically assumes that based on the age difference or relations here between a Teacher and Student were "non-consensual" and automatically forced", because under the Law, it believes those who have not reached officially declared adulthood, do not have a valid opinion or belief, or it assumed that it cannot be legitimized, but only because the Law says so. Which is absolute crock. You must question, who makes these laws?

Let's be honest, the teacher above, is actually very attractive. I also do not sense anything predatory about her, she does not have traits that lend to a likelihood of being a Sexual Predator, but she does look like she may be depressed and has some trauma.

Her eyes are not the eyes of someone who is a sexual predator, not really likely at any rate. I'd give a 1% chance "at best" that she would have been such a predator in this case, on the chance of something coming up in a brain scan.

To the best extent that "actual" sexual predators could be pursued, there is more than enough abilities to use proven Scientific methods and even a brain scan if such needed to be proven, but even facial features and other known traits can often be attributed to identify actual sexual predators who just "may" have in fact "graped"  someone, according to what would be a plausible definition for it.

For example, it is proven that there is a strong tendency of Males to be sexual predators if they have a heavily sloped foreheads (except for Negroes) and if they have early hair balding on the sides but where the hair is still excessively intact in the front center above the forehead.

Ears that stick out wide, strange nasal sounding voices that are very abrasive are also common among actual Male Sexual Predators.

The other thing with "grape", is that "grape" is also witnessed everywhere among the Animal Kingdom as a fact of life. The only fact that Humans choose to create litigation pertaining to how it is defined, is are simply based on Man-made concepts and subjective viewpoints which are typically created by Men who wish to dominate or control access to Women or Reproduction usually for their own ill-intended gains, not to establish Justice.

You can't tell me that Many Men would not fantasize about "sleeping" with that Female Teacher, irrespective of what one wants to attribute to any kind of "morals" because morals are not what you think they are.

Morals are also not facts, and the perception that someone as a "Teacher" makes a difference in the equation, is a completely ridiculous and programmed notion.

Truthfully, the only plausible case for identifying or punishing sexual predators can be through the Scientific Method to determine at least "first-hand" outside of any allegations, if the person possesses traits or even Brain neurology (a brain scan will determine it) to see if they are indeed a Sexual predator.

If the Neurology of the "suspect" comes back as "negative" in terms of having cranial and frontal cortex attributes associated with Sexual Predators, then it really is too difficult of a case to make to clear or even take seriously.

Other grounds that can be "suitable" for legitimately classifying a case of "Grape" are especially if a foreigner ended up having their way with someone, which would for most purpose be a more valid ground for an actual case of establishing a factual Grape.

The fact is that it's usually a "Man" or "Male" teacher or other member of society who will always receive the vilification from both other Men and Women, typically in most cases, but the irony of it all, is that the hatred and vilification towards the Man, has absolutely NOTHING to do with hating him for what he did, in the case if the Man is really guilty of something. This is why you will notice that Men are always EVER-READY to accuse, shame and call other Men "scum" even just based on rumors of "grape" without being willing to hear both sides or the facts.

The reason is because these Men, and the Women who vilify the Men whom they deem as "Sexual Predators"  don't care about the alleged crime, whether or not there was one, it doesn't matter.

They only care to eliminate "competition" of other Men. On the Women's side, it has to do with projection of the hatred most Women have for Men, but NPC Men are ALWAYS looking for any excuse to punish other Men or find any fault or factor they can use to eliminate them from both the Financial and Sexual Access Pools of society, and want to also be seen as an "Impressive Defender" of Women by other Women.

So none of it is genuine based on any actual care for someone who was victimized in a very rare incident where someone was actually victimized.

And if we had to play devil's advocate to second guess that, why else would the Liberal White Women who always cry about how many times they've been graped and sexually assaulted, demand that Illegal Immigrants should have rights to our lands?

Considering that the majority of Grapes are EXTREMELY rare and mostly only carried out by Illegal Immigrants who belong to Trafficking Networks.

That proves to you that even under the smoke and mirrors of their "tongues", that they themselves don't even really believe in or care about grape in actuality. They see it more as a "tool" or "weapon" to use to get money, clout and access to resources or privileges within the system by pretending to be a victim.

And considering how much "Grape Porn" Women watch, haha, that tells you all you need to know.

They fantasize about it so much.

And similarly, most Male students often will have at least one teacher who is "hot" that they fantasize about in their youth, and absolutely would willingly take to bed instantly. I had my fair share when I was young, and I would have "loved" to have been "graped" by them.

Grape is actually so rare in Western Nations in particular, and difficult from all angles to actually even occur, that far less than 1% of Legal Citizens throughout all of Western Nations have ever committed "Grape" against any Woman.

The best thing that a Primal-minded person should understand, is that a Society should not have Litigation or Law Enforcement where these institutions have a monopoly on both Sex and Violence.

And the people who believe that organized institutions or bodies like these should have that kind of power, are absolute tyrants and scum of society.

When you have systems that are going to partake in attributing Litigation towards something based on Sex and Violence, they must be done from a completely impartial viewpoint but also only on the basis of a vested interest in the case if there was something detrimental that occurred, but it would have to be something very difficult to prove and not much leeway  or interpretation should be given for it.

As I've said, in an ideal world, if Police Officers exist to eradicate even violent offenders, then if they know who is the real victim and who is the real offender, they ought to take side and help the victim even if it means assistance in retaliation. But Police often exist only for the sake of ensuring problems never get resolved, and to make sure inequities exist in society.

Police will prefer to break up a fight and actually will often be more prone to arresting the victim long before the actual villain. This is not by accident that it works this way, especially when the victim is a Male.

If you ask me, I personally think it should be "Legal" for a Man to unalive another Man  (or even other Women such as friends)  who tries to block access to a Woman he wanted. May the best "win" the broad he wants to sleep with, that would be how Nature would have it anyway.

If this actually were something "Legal" to do, it would completely change the playing field and many Men would "think twice" before trying to steal a chick from another guy or creating problems, because you might never know if the Man decides to target him.

People will still do something like that even with the Laws in place anyway, it happens all the time, just not as overtly described in the News or Local Events.

When it comes to Women who like to accuse Men of grape, but particularly the claim of Statutory grape, they don't care whether a Man actually did any grape, it has all to do with the fact that Older Women hate when they are unwanted as they get older and for a Man to have access to younger Women. So they use that as a means of punishing Men who get with younger Women because of their jealousy.