How Christianity Has Warped The Definition & Your Understanding Of Evil

The problem with the word "Evil" and the understanding behind it, is that this word often has Biblical Implications or Definitions, and that Religions have collectively worked to interpret Evil from their own very understanding, but not based on a Scientific Definition.

Any Scientific Definition of Evil, would absolutely qualify and supersede any Religious or Superstitious Notion of the word, or anything that is "Faith-based".

The true meaning of Evil, is a Lack of Empathy, and the context of what is actually deemed Scientific is less the outcome or "action" committed by someone, but rather the intention, or if even a lack of intention.

Evil, in actuality, is more rooted not the fact for example, if someone "deletes" someone, but rather the motive behind it and if they enacted something in order to gain an advantage that they did not earn or deserve.

For example, a person who lives out of touch with reality, let's say they even live their entire life out of touch with reality and lacking in understanding of reality. That person is EVIL.

Because they are living in a means that is NOT correct or in alignment with reality.

On the other hand, if someone deleted someone, for all we know, this person might have been your Neighborhood or Community Hero. Such an action cannot be automatically deemed as "Evil".

Hell, we could take this example to the extreme, let's say there was a special "assassin" that lived who's lifetime career was to ruthlessly delete anyone who they deemed was not worthy. There is a high chance this person could even NOT be Evil whatsoever, meanwhile the Individual who might have never deleted a soul, but lived a life against the grain of reality and out of touch with it, lived a life which was absolutely Evil and Improper.

For example, if someone lives by the protections and security of Institutions, say of Government or an Insurance company. Essentially, that person is living artificially and this would be deemed as "Evil", because Nature and General circumstances, would not permit the outcomes of this.

Therefore, that is the real definition of Evil.

Evil, is basically something that violates principles or the fair exchange of how something is supposed to operate, or living outside the boundaries of what is fair and proper, even based outside of ones personal biases.

For example, it's quite Ironic that Christians love to virtue signal about their "goodness", but have a knack for Gambling.

Gambling, in fact, is evil. It is evil because you are banking on a system where you pool money to take money from others through a scheme that is not justified. It doesn't matter whether you or the other "players" and the House all agree to the rules or having your money taken from you and distributed to others.

The principle behind it, is based on evil, because of how it is structured, even if there is no willful evil "action" as such.

In Gambling, your "loss" is someone else's "gain" or vice versa or whatever the case scenario is, but the fact that makes it evil, EVEN IF you agree to this loss / gain bet, is that the "gain" was never based on actual legitimate earning or obtaining of the winnings. Therefore it is unjust, and therefore "Evil".

It's not the same as YOU willfully giving money to someone or paying for something for them, because money in this transaction saved up labor from productive value (theoretically, let's assume), and you decided to directly transfer this to someone else.

The problem is that gambling has variables that are not in alignment with one's will, and that essentially makes it become evil in the process, even if all parties willingly gambled their money for an unjustified "gain" even in the "hopes" of making a gain.

Interestingly enough, even the Muslims ban gambling in their religion, while the Christians do not and seem to have an obsession with it.

Christians will tell you that Sex before marriage is "evil" or a "sin",  but yet they speak nothing of the ones who use Sex to rob other people of their energies through act via the Chakra system, and yet this we would deem as "evil".

You should never trust or rely on religions to classify what they deem as "Evil".

Because of Christianity and its long-term influence in the West, you have whole groups of people who want to have a system where violence is monopolized and regulated by third parties, and where anyone who protects themselves, is not seen as a victim but rather an offender.

I would say that the interloper of a conflict between 2 people, say even a street fight, is actually the "evil person" in the mix of a fight that ought to otherwise naturally play out between 2 people or even 2 groups of people in a violent conflict.

Anyone who participates in anything which is trying to artificially intercept or change the outcomes of what is designed to run its course, this is absolutely the true definition of what it means to be Evil.

You could be a person who thinks you are a "good person" because you provide canned food and supplies to some sort of Food Drive which might protect some of the biggest losers according to Nature.

Your actions would not be one of "Goodness" or "Selflessness", but actually would be Evil, as you try to enable and protect specimens which otherwise would not be permitted to live and thrive under a Natural Order.

All of this is the true definition of Evil.

And yet, the Christians would argue you hand and fist, tooth and nail to defend the person who sacrificed for others, or did some kind of so-called "good deed", even if that deed was done in vanity or to enable those who otherwise ought not to be given.