The Map Which Shows 4500 Years Of Global Conflicts & Wars
No, The Whole White Race Is "Not Superior", And Never Has Been
I had read a comment earlier this morning under one of Sv3rige's videos on Rumble on a recent video dealing with the topic of Illegal Immigrants. The comment is as follows: "NaturalxInclination 4 hours ago Hitler did one mistake. He thought the german race is the most superior. The truth is, the whole white race in general is superior. Every white person should procreate with whites, doesn't matter if swedes with norwegians or germans or france or english people. We should avoid to mix with black/brown people. Otherwise we all will end up as a brown sludge without pride." This is an absolutely incorrect statement. If this individual or anyone read Mein Kampf, they would have clearly read Hitler's statement on the German Race or generally as the Nordic Race existing as the "Master Race", and he made no hesitation in making this fact evident, and was not mistaken. As the New Master Race to Govern and Control Europe and Influence the world. It is also impor...
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteProbably not a psyop...it just makes sense that the Western Europe is the center of it all, so it is prime real estate, worth fighting over.
ReplyDeleteAs I've said, conflicts can indicate a number of things. Some wars or conflicts can be "just", other of them can be in the total defiance to assert one tribe of people's over another. Some of the battles can be local skirmishes, to outright civil wars, if not times that Europe was defending itself from outside invaders.
ReplyDeleteBut not everything is either Black or White. On one hand, it shows a Race which has had ever greater ambitions to assert itself and also conquer out inferiors to levels unseen in other parts of the world, so as to create a "Greater" culture. But on another hand, many conflicts can also be senseless ones, or ones rooted in Imperial overreach.
Europe is also one of the most agriculturally and resource poor continents in the world, and pretty much all of it except for Southern Europe.
It cannot possibly be a psyop. Anyone with a strong historical knowledge knows that Europe is a war-torn continent and has seen large shares of all kinds of battles over ideologies, religions and races.
All those dots in the USA must be including the Indian fighting?
ReplyDeleteI don't consider those unjust as the Indians made it perfectly clear that that was the only way to deal with them. Sure, there were atrocities committed against them but that was simply turn about.
@Here for the apolcalype, Yes most of the ones on American soil were between Indian Wars and also various conflicts between different Americans at time, including periodic British soldiers and other Massacres.
Delete@Here for the apocalypse, the key problem with how the American Colonists dealt with American Indians is that they went too far with it and started just killing them for sports. Many American Indian tribes were indeed very violent or savage. It would be one thing if the attacks were simply based on reprisals and necessity, or to sort out better tribes from the inferior ones to have as an Alliance against the more savage ones. At time, that "sort-of" did occur, but eventually it became more of a program of extermination and exploiting them, than strictly relegated to defense.
Delete@PSA- "Alliance against the more savage ones. At time, that "sort-of" did occur, but eventually it became more of a program of extermination and exploiting them, than strictly relegated to defense."
DeleteSure, thats basically inevitable once violence becomes the only solution. Just as your stance with all women. The problem arises at that point that you cannot trust the other side to not double cross you.
Violence once unleashed becomes extremely hard to reign back in. Which is why when the USA finally collapses it will be the bloodiest thing the world has ever seen. Probably the reason for the huge population decline predicted in the deagle report.
@Here for the apocalypse, All true.
DeleteBut the reason that the reputation for what the British Colonists did doesn't hold up well historically, is because they brought the "pox" with them and introduced the Indians to alcohol in order to deceive them. So it demonstrates that the attacks were much more personal and based on terrorism than they were about asserting authority of a Superior Force over an Inferior.
America hadn't gone through the same form of National Development that Europe largely did, and so that's why it's often also attributed to same thing the Israelis are doing to the Palestinians.