Is a Man's Desire To Have Children Inherently / Inevitably Selfish and Ego-maniacal!?

YES, and I say that emphatically.

I will tell you from personal experience, but even from an objective standpoint, that Men who absolutely insist on having children or do not accept the circumstance of a Woman who does not want children, or if the Man leaves a Woman based on the desire not to have children, or a Man who absolutely is obsessed with having and raising a family, can only do so from an Ego-maniacal standpoint.

"Red-pill Men" who claim that Women who don't want children are inevitably "bad" or that it's a "red flag" are complete Egomaniacs, and these Men in particular are the ones most obsessed with having children for Hired Labor and to grow their influence over the segment of their population or Nation.

This makes a Man feel powerful, but although he may become powerful from this act, especially having many many children, he loses his personal identity and passions in the process. It makes no sense.

And in cases where it's not for these reasons, it's the idea of being taken care of when you become older and sick. But there is a double-edged sword in this decision! And it goes back to the linear thinking process, because those who choose to have their children as a "life insurance policy" overlook the fact that they will age horribly and likely have greater health issues, both the Men and the Women, later on in life. This is an absolute fact, and I don't care about your feelings related to it, because it's the truth.

Even the Women who have the pregnancies, it will absolutely weaken her. It's a myth that Women grow stronger after each pregnancy. It ages and destroys the body, much more so than any other species of animal on Earth.

So the thing is, Men and Women are in some cases sabotaging their entire future, and even perhaps their health and quality of life, on the basis that they have someone to take care of them when they grow older. A very short-sighted decision.

While having one child has been proven to be soul-sucking enough for someone to raise, the magical number for where almost all parents completely lose personal connections to their children occurs on the fourth child, and the parents will have nothing but superficial relations with them on all levels, and likely not even know who they raised as a child.

The problem is, even I cannot suggest that, if a Man or Woman have children that it's equally a selfless act for the sake of "securing the Nation's future", because that is contingent upon the civilization being valuable enough to be born into. We are just perpetuating the inevitable, because eventually all Nations throughout history demonstrate collapse from loose elements or invasions that conquer it.

We don't live forever, and the progeny we have, we will not be around to even witness the majority of their life, in most cases.

And, I understand that doesn't "fit the bill" of life here on Earth and for the survival of the species.

But it also illustrates a point to where this existence never makes sense or has anything in favor of things for you.

If there was an existence that was permanent and where the creation of life did not involve sacrifice of oneself in the process, then I can absolutely see no problem with it.

I want to also emphasize, that I don't make the rules here, in this existence.

Science and many demonstrations to challenge the reasons of having children, or Pro-Natalist stances, there is not a single answer or possibility that demonstrates a good decision to have children that is moral or just, or truly selfless.

One can say they might be having children for National Survival, but it condemns the child to inherit the current problems of the civilization they are born into, and possibly one which will have even more problems, and they will have to inherit situations they didn't ask to have, along with being condemned to an eventual death sentence anyway.

But for a Man, to use children to gain power or access to power / influence in society, is a really really bad deal and an ego-maniacal one, because he has to completely throw away his own identity and self-worth in the process.

When all is said and done, it's a really bad deal.

There has not been found a single legitimate and selfless reason for a Man or Woman to have children, and it is often Men and Women who get bored with each other who develop the urge to have them.

The other relevant fact to consider behind everything here that stands strong as well, is the fact that 99% of all species of life forms from all time that have existed on this Earth, have sooner or later gone extinct.

The only majority of species that still are alive which are prehistoric, belong the scavenger groups, such as Cockroaches, or Seagulls, Turtles and especially various Deep Sea creatures.

Humans are not scavengers, and we've had a very short run in comparison to these many other animals, and their programmed design in this Matrix is geared around "cleanup operations", which is probably why they will never go away any time soon. Most parasites as well, including ticks, are prehistoric and share a much longer lifespan than other creatures.

When you look at life from this standpoint, and not just at your linear life in the present moment, you begin to realize that Nature is absolutely not your friend, and Nature does not care about your personal desires or wants, and only that you reproduce, because this existence is an enslavement realm.

If you don't like what I say here, take it to "God". Not me. Oh, but that's right... There is no "God" for you to turn too.

See how senseless this existence is!? And supposedly, God created this entire place.

He even made you to feel "pain" if you decide you've had enough and want to end it all.

So yeah.

As much as I despise Women, I will never criticize them for not wanting children. It's just not a positive thing. And the truth on this subject should come more and more to light, because Humans have been engaging in a major "act" to cover up the truth and also hiding the information all to keep the species going and to make sure that newer generations are always brainwashed into having children and doing so by the means of guilt.

Comments

  1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqpIwqHFoyg

    He is right about this...no such thing as fatherhood.

    It is her child, not yours.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Pocket Aces, I never watched much by Traversable, but I am amazed with some of the things he ultimately recognizes. But he is absolutely right in all of his statements. I don't think Men have any idea what the truth is about the children they have with a Woman, and they have relied for far too long on "Religious Myths" trying to mold a false construct as if the Man and Woman is "united under God" and to forge a myth to make it seem as if the Child also belongs to the Father. On a Genetic level, yes, but on a Legal or Actual Level in Practice and Theory, absolutely not. And the Woman doesn't see it as theirs.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

No, The Whole White Race Is "Not Superior", And Never Has Been

The Charlie Kirk Psyop Is Evaporating

Why The US Is Really The Most Hopeless Place To Live