No, The Whole White Race Is "Not Superior", And Never Has Been

I had read a comment earlier this morning under one of Sv3rige's videos on Rumble on a recent video dealing with the topic of Illegal Immigrants.

The comment is as follows:

"NaturalxInclination
4 hours ago
Hitler did one mistake. He thought the german race is the most superior. The truth is, the whole white race in general is superior.
Every white person should procreate with whites, doesn't matter if swedes with norwegians or germans or france or english people. We should avoid to mix with black/brown people. Otherwise we all will end up as a brown sludge without pride."


This is an absolutely incorrect statement.

If this individual or anyone read Mein Kampf, they would have clearly read Hitler's statement on the German Race or generally as the Nordic Race existing as the "Master Race", and he made no hesitation in making this fact evident, and was not mistaken.

As the New Master Race to Govern and Control Europe and Influence the world.

It is also important to note that the concept of a "Master Race" is not exclusive to Hitler, as many Germans including Wilhelm II and many German Intellectuals from the 1800's often spoke about the Master Race concept of the Germanic peoples.

The fact is that there are only 3 European Races that qualify as a "Master Race", which I have explained many times in the past:

1. Germans [Nordics]
2. Romans
3. Greeks

Outside of these races, all other Europeans are "Barbarians" and never became civilized or highly sophisticated outside of the Influence and Imperial Legacy of these 3 Great people.

Even outside of that, not all "Nordic" peoples are equal either. We are just similar.

Enlightenment and actually "Thinking", which largely can be traced to the Greeks, would have never come to Europe without them.

Much of the things we know such as advanced forms of Art, Engineering, Poetry, and all kinds of Inventions and Civilization products that have become a part of European Culture, would have never reached the prominence they had, without all 3 of these people.

Most forms of Advanced Thought, Reflection, Emotion and forms of Justice that came about for fellow Man, emerged only from these 3 Key Races of Europeans.

Intellectual Thoughts, Creativity and Ideas from other races are always inferior and less.

And the proof of this, is that if you travel in any European country today, you will find that German Artifacts, including Architecture or Influences are found the most in every European country, along with Minorities of German Community Settlements, and that the next in line of influences and remnants that can be found all over Europe, are from the Romans.

Romans will always be regarded as the Race who "Mastered" the use of Concrete, in a way that still has not been repeated today.

Without these 3 Races, most Europeans would still be living more similarly on the level of many Africans.

The Topic of the effects of "Race Mixing" is what this guy seems to not understand.

No Race should mix at all, and it will have a negative effect with any Race who does it, not just White people.

Even an African or Chinese person who "mixes", and yet still exists in their civilization, will become a weaker link in the chain of their Racial Lineage, the moment that foreign blood is introduced.

Comments

  1. "Outside of these races, all other Europeans are "Barbarians" and never became civilized or highly sophisticated outside of the Influence and Imperial Legacy of these 3 Great people."

    That's what someone called 'Nordic antisemite' said in his blog several years ago. His blog has been deleted but thankfully his blog is still on archive.org. He wrote several articles stating that not all 'whites' are equal:

    https://web.archive.org/web/20170114082944/https://nordicantisemite.com/2014/09/06/why-white-is-not-good-enough/

    https://web.archive.org/web/20170120181629/https://nordicantisemite.com/2015/08/09/the-psychology-of-being-an-inferior-race/

    And here is an article specifically on modern Greece:

    https://web.archive.org/web/20161226051752/https://nordicantisemite.com/2015/06/22/greece-to-scandinavia-mongrel-madness-2/

    Unfortunately modern Greece is an absolute joke, if you look at the Y-DNA haplogroups of modern Greece (and also Italy); at least half the males have Y-DNA chromosomes from the Middle East and North Africa. Athens today is a city where many people live in poverty, are drug addicts and is full of graffiti, there is graffiti literally everywhere. And the 'culture' is also a disgrace, modern Greece and many other countries in the Balkans are full of clowns, gossipers, backstabbers e.t.c. A superior race would have turned Greece into a literal paradise, since the country has good soil for growing food, good weather, access to the sea e.t.c. That country has so many advantages, it just needed a superior race to put those resources to good use.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't agree with that guy's notion that the ancient Greeks and Romans were Nordics; they were clearly a different Caucasian subgroup by looking at their statues; however he is right that the modern Greeks and Italians have miscegenated to a large extent with inferior people from the Middle East and North Africa...

      Delete
    2. @Alex,

      Really? Interesting, never heard of Nordic Antisemite, I will have to check that out! Thanks for posting the Archive Links...

      Correct, the Modern Greece is a joke and in no way can be attributed to the "Superior Aryans" that they used to be. Only a very small portion of the Greek [Hellenic] Race today still has Pure "Hellas" in their veins.

      Majority of them have been interbred with Persians, Jews, Slavs and other invaders, and that's why it's such a corrupt and backwards country that never has escaped that.

      Rome also never recovered from it's fall, although there still had been some occasional "legendary figures" that emerged from even the times of the Middle ages into the European Revival, but since the early part of the 20th century, there have not been any truly remarkable "Italians" that have been found among their Modern Population. It is yet another country that has absolutely no future.

      Everything you said is so true about the Greeks. And they are ridiculously "CHEAP" in a way that is offensive to the sense of being "Frugal" in the German sense.

      Greeks are so cheap, that even while I run a business, some Greek I know who I had formerly done work for, had the nerve to approach me to borrow "tools" from me to do something on his own, but he did so from a standpoint of trying to make it seem like he wasn't doing that. I can't describe it, but the Modern Greeks are the most conniving, sneaky son of a bitches when it comes to things like that.

      Also, I am not a fan of the Spartan or Cretans of Greece, they are my least favorite of all people, even while "Spartans" are looked up too, they were absolute assholes, and still are.

      Delete
    3. Here is another interesting politically incorrect blog about the different racial groups, that was deleted but was saved on archive.org. It's in Spanish so it needs to be translated to English:

      https://web.archive.org/web/20170704211759/http://europasoberana.blogspot.com.es/2013/05/la-nueva-clasificacion-racial-i.html

      Delete
    4. "Also, I am not a fan of the Spartan or Cretans of Greece, they are my least favorite of all people, even while "Spartans" are looked up too, they were absolute assholes, and still are."

      I doubt there are any real Spartans left today, as for people from Crete; they have a bad reputation even within Greece....

      Delete
    5. @Alex, Where we live plays a role that gives us a certain uniqueness to our appearance or expression.
      The Earth possesses vibrations that can "modify" man to some degree in a particular place, although not so drastically and definitive.
      It all still largely depends on assimilation and genetic destiny.

      Anyone who knows their thing in racialism sees that the majority (if not all) of the Roman and Greek statues have a Nordic component that is, however, specific in a way to Romans & Greeks, but it is still, in essence, Nordic.
      So, while "Nordic" generally signifies the notion of "something northern", the North itself is also a living being that, unlike Earth, gave birth to a celestial Man from the deepest Midnight & beyond, which is Solar/Nordic.

      Hence, it is not a coincidence that Pagan Greeks and Romans were patriarchal and worshipped the Sun.
      They also claimed their origin from beyond the North - since the poles of the Earth also shifted when Hyperborea disappeared.
      It definitely has a link to common ancestry.

      Therefore, Greeks & Romans would also be an involution of past civilization and time that only poets or Minnesingers could conjure up through the songs.
      Like for example, Wagner with his "Parsifal Overture", which is also about restoring a Dream, a land of the Men-god beyond this place & time, through our hearts and always with woman in our minds or beside us - although not the one which Prussian wants to punch in the face.

      But the kind that you make love with your eyes or dream the same dream and love one another in your dream, with a state of constant orgasm between you two and the breath of longing as light as a spring morning.
      That kind.

      Delete
    6. There are obvious differences between the Nordics and the ancient Greeks and Romans. Arno Breker the German sculptor made a statue that represented the Nordic archetype:

      https://live.staticflickr.com/7523/15905884626_3e1cba1df3_b.jpg

      And these are statues of ancient Greeks and Romans:

      Aristippus:
      https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTU9lHrqICEev7QfOGQ5K0EOJh7oQpEZg5duw&s

      Augustus Caesar:
      https://assets.editorial.aetnd.com/uploads/2009/11/augustus-caesar-587488458.jpg

      Julius Caesar:
      https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8f/Gaius_Iulius_Caesar_%28Vatican_Museum%29.jpg/170px-Gaius_Iulius_Caesar_%28Vatican_Museum%29.jpg

      Pericles:
      https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4b/Pericles_Pio-Clementino_Inv269_n2.jpg

      Themistokles:
      https://grammaticus.co/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Themistocles-in-Helmet.jpg

      They clearly have different facial features and skull shapes.

      Delete
    7. @Alex, Yeah, but no.
      Despite having the basis in the Nordic race, the statue of Arno Breker represents Superman - a total man. It is a spiritual-psychic conformation.
      It goes beyond and much deeper into matter than improving or preserving the race on a biological level, although those stages were significant at some point in the German Reich. Today, no longer needed.

      As far as the ancient Romans and Greeks go, the influence and resemblance existed in the same respect, despite deliberate modification/exaggeration of some of the figures.
      Nevertheless, it still points out that the historical makeup of ancient Greece and Rome derives from the same archetype, which altogether preserves (or at least it tried to keep) the memory of the Hyperborean heritage alive that, in the first place, gave birth to Nordic people (although involuted) who then planted the seed of civilization and culture across the world.

      Delete
    8. The issue that a lot of Racial Theorists, or those who come up with various forms of understanding about various races, is they fail to take into account, that even under a people as vast as the Greeks or Romans were, they came from many various ethnic groups which even at times had different features from one another.

      Nordic Peoples are not the same as the Greek or Roman Race, they even had different stature. The Germanics always noticed the shorter stature among even the Romans.

      Even the Olive Skin / Various Texture, Prominent Aquiline Nose, Darker Hair and Eye Features, have actually been stereotypically common among Romans and even certain Greek City-States from Ancient Times, even before they were "raped" by countless invaders.

      It also couldn't make any logical sense to refer to the same Races of the Mediterranean as being that of the "Nordic" variant, since Nord always derives from "Northern" peoples and means "North, or "People of the North", referring to Northern Europe, and it was how Southern Europeans and other European groups distinguished the Germanic types of the North compared to their own.

      There are many Historical Revisionist theories out there that seek to diminish the Racial Origins and Accomplishments or Unique Heritage / Attributes of the Hellenic and Roman Peoples, but the truth is they are actually one Branch of the Caucasian Aryans in their own respect.

      Even evident of this is that they developed all kinds of Systems and Institutions, even a very Large Extended Family Structure that was always more "Collectivist" compared to the "Individualistic" Nature of Nordic Peoples.

      Nordic Peoples did not invent things the vast forms of "Love" or "Agape" as it's called which the Greeks had invented.

      We are all different people but complimentary, and we are similar in the fact that yes we all share Indo-European ancestry.

      It is also important to remember as well, that there was another segment among the Romans, for example, known as "Latium", which was the capital area for the Roman Empire or what was part of "Lazio" in the Intalian Peninsula. Half of the Roman Race consisted of these people, of which a large branch of the Modern People of Italy, and Spain have direct ancestry to these people, and it's essentially where the idea to refer to others as "LATINS" also came from, but the Empire was largely a mixture between Romans and Latins, so-to-speak, even though all were recognized as Roman citizens.

      Many Romans, also had not only cultural influence from Greece, but also did incorporate some Hellenic DNA as well. In fact, the Upper Classes of Rome, especially among its leadership and elites, not only spoke Latin but also spoke Greek.

      If the Romans were the same people as the Nordic Race, it wouldn't have made sense for any rivalry or invasions when the Visigoths sacked Rome, or even if you read the many length encounters spoken by Julius Caeser. It would be impossible for us to be the same people. Even if there are Romans with blonde hair and blue eyes.

      Delete
    9. @PSA,

      I think you tend to contradict yourself by saying "Greek & Roman race", when they were not fundamentally separate or exclusive races.
      Different racial elements got assimilated there with time, creating the branches and "unique" ethnic identity that, with the infiltration of Christianity, became this typical gregarious type of community whose seed left foundation for the future birth of its illegitimate child - communism in Europe.
      That is another insight into the historical downgrade of all ancient empires throughout this time/era on a genetic level, where we can never neglect the fingers of the Jewish fifth column in the entire unfolding process.

      It is why the diverse sub-racial characteristics didn't pop out of nowhere in Southern Europe and elsewhere, despite, as we have said, that the parts of the Earth can influence a man in his appearance, but not that much and definitive.
      In the end, it all comes down to the original genetic centre and all European racial sub-groups are derivative of the Nordic type as its involuting form so to speak, not evolutionary to a specific geographical area or climate - although Nordics itself have different variations and are the product of general involution that occurred at some point in time after the destruction of Atlantis and disappearance of Hyperborea.
      All consequences has its roots in it.

      But that is altogether another "pair of shoes" of which we can speak, where we can even touch upon other earthly races and the purpose of their genetic engineering in Atlantis, including the creation of reptilians, etc.
      Racial colours have (or might have) roots in alchemy (not the one of medieval practice) but rather something of high technology & "magic" that forms the spiritual essences linked to this aspect of colours and how they interact in genetic splicing between each other within the plane of simulation.

      Nevertheless, I tried (maybe not in the most dextrously) to bring out my opinion regarding this highly controversial and complicated topic, which implies the conception of ancient Greece & Rome as a part of the continuous involution of past civilizations and times, despite being a seemingly revolutionary phenomenon that marked the beginning of European history & legacy.
      They are just fragments of something much bigger that existed before them.

      Because, two thousand years before our era, Nordic peoples were indeed the ones who settled around the Mediterranean Sea, reaching Egypt as well, founding the first dynasty, etc.
      The proof there exists in Runes, which they took to Asia Minor.
      The same goes for South & North America.
      Interestingly, you see, this is not a popular opinion at all.
      There exists no such thing as a historical revision that talks about this stuff or tries to point out the roots of world culture and spirituality in the Northern origin.

      The notion of the North, among popular opinions, further remains as some geographical location in Europe with primitive, barbaric and superstitious tribes.
      They are all ignorant of its glory, strength, and knowledge, not to say beauty that always inspired poets and pilgrims of nostalgia - including even Apollo himself!
      But not just as a mere location but as the spirit of entity which forms the landscape of different vibratory essence, as so within, so outside of us.

      It is enough to see that "modern" society still believes the Earth is a solid sphere instead of a hollow.
      They still do not know that the rising Sun does not come from the East, let alone that the first ones who gave the world breath of freshness and aspiration were the Nordic entity in the parts of the world that today remain as places of dysfunctional sub-humans, scarce, involuting nature & deserts as the reminder of what happens when you forgot the Hyperborean heritage and the star of your origin, which is not in this or that economic doctrine or here or there, left or right, but beyond all classes and all of it - beyond good & evil.

      Delete
    10. @Someone88

      There are no contradictions whatsoever. We've addressed this topic in times past, and every time I have come across someone who possesses your views, they always say the same things word for word, and they automatically believe as well that Blue Eyes and Blonde Hair are a Nordic Trait only, even though it's possessed by many other races as well.

      This same retardation "theory" or "logic", when presented with the question to these Nordicist groups about Germans who have Brown Hair and Eyes, then what race are they? The same Nordicists believe that these "Germans" Intermixed with Mediterraneans and are not "Pure Germans", even though Germans have always historically had more darker features among more Specimens, than the Lighter ones, with a rough variation of a 60%-40% ratio in the German population.

      So which one is it then!? The Germans are mixed with another race if they have darker features?

      This is comical nonsense.

      It is a Nordicist view, to believe that the Greeks or Romans were not separate Races from the Nordic Peoples. It's complete Histroical Revisionism.

      The fact that you cannot see that, for whatever reasons, is a major flaw on your part, and is not acceptable, and it does not fit any paradigm or model of historical points that could even be remotely verified or factual.

      To even have to add the Flat Earth vs Spherical beliefs into all of this too, just shows how impotent your entire argument is.

      Nordic peoples never have had prior influence in Southern Europe, they were not even united as Tribes from the times of Rome and Before, they were very loosely formed.

      Maybe you are thinking of the "Celts", because the Celts had presence all over Europe including Southern Europe before the Emergence of Greek and later Roman Influence.

      But the Celts are not a Nordic Race. The Baltic peoples are also not a Nordic Race, even in so far as whether or not they resemble the people the same.

      Perhaps you are thinking about the Norman Conquests in Southern Italy or something. In fact, whatever "Germanic" DNA that exists in the Italian population, has always been from historic intermingling or from being conquered, which is why Italians in the North of the peninsula often have lighter features. They are half-breeds, and this occurred in more Modern Times, rather than Ancient Times, since Romans had laws that forbade Marriage and inter-breeding for the large duration of the Roman Empire's existence.

      Intermingling with people over the course of history does not change the fact, if even due to Colonization or being Conquered, because the root races are a separate people altogether, and all Genetic DNA even backs this up.

      It is just a lame attempt for Nordic people to try to boast of their historical accomplishments from things they had not done, since the Nordic Race, really only has had a prevalent history for about the last 2000 years, whereas many other civilizations go back many more thousands of years.

      It is simply ignorant, and I would argue even criminal to attempt to use Historical Revisionism as a means to entirely erase the significance of a specific Ethnic group and their culture, and to attribute it to your own.

      It's just even more "silly" to think that Nordic people would create a vastly different language such as the Greek or Latin languages, which predate the Germanic ones, it wouldn't even make sense to have vastly different languages as these.

      The phonetic words even spoken by various Germanic people, whether they are Swedish, Dutch or what have you, are still at least somewhat more similar to German, than they ever are, even in Loan Words, with Latin.

      Come on Man... Give this nonsense up.

      Delete
    11. "It is a Nordicist view, to believe that the Greeks or Romans were not separate Races from the Nordic Peoples. It's complete Histroical Revisionism."

      Nordicists are doing the same thing the negroes "we wuz kangz" are doing; trying to still other people's history. It's quite pathetic...

      Delete
    12. @PSA It depends, it depends.
      I think as well that it would be an exaggeration to consider that generally Germans with brown or dark hair/eyes are of mixed race.
      There was never such intention in the first place neither the theory of the "flat earth" because a flat earth does not shine and is not hollow at its poles.
      But yeah, usually, other features come into play to conclude the overall racial identity of the person.
      However, having "swarthier" features does point to a certain degree of inherited distant admixture (which is nothing surprising or bad) and is present more or less among each European at this point for some time now.
      There are also unusual cases where racial bastards attain light eyes or even hair, but they are still predominately mixed, as much as someone who might not have blue eyes or blond hair might still be predominantly Nordic or, for example, German. It can vary.
      Ironically, it's not all "black" and "white".

      The point is that blue eyes and blonde hair (along with some other physical features characteristic of the Nordic), in reality, make up the form of an authentic Aryan Man for which official history will certainly not talk about in a thorough significance, and it can vary in various degrees from person to person of European descent since it is NOT a dominant gene.
      Generally speaking, and contrary to popular public opinion and all other misunderstandings, I would say that the Nordic racial component is the primary and ORIGINAL stock of what we call today the "White race" since the Nordic genetics are least dominant for the exact reason of the genetical substance presents a measure whose value cannot be intermingled with incompatible racial -even sub-racial types and, in a worse scenario, can only be recessive.
      I don't see any fuss about it, even less if someone does not fill the "criteria" of it, since there is STILL so much to it than mere physical prospects, which is still anyhow important factor that complements psychic characteristic of a Man and his nature.

      Delete
    13. @Alex


      you are quite wrong and in the same measure as the average negro who thinks that there is the present whitewashing of history in favour of Europeans.
      So, you don't need to complement the Prussian argument to tell me obliquely that I or people like me are pathetic.
      Because there is no "nordicism" in this world, kid, except in some
      "remote corners" of the internet that are long forgotten and ridiculed.
      Look around you a bit better, and you might see it.
      Don't be pathetic yourself and develop an independent stance where you are not afraid to be challenged by whatever it may be, especially not something that is by default program popular and immovable dogma of, muh, "science".

      Delete
    14. You know, it’s all good. So wonderful and unique hearing everyone’s point of view.

      I’d like to add, that Nordic this or not or up or down, it’s positive, it's both and neither, it’s more than the physical, and it’s more than the scientific or philosophical, the definite

      Someone88’s way of writing points to and describes that higher state, the untouched sensitivity, the Innocence of the Silence and coziness in the cold, the warmth, the sublime, celestial, otherworldly beauty of the North and the Spiritual Northern races, the truly pure female, what is was meant to be and could be. We know…

      And reading these many comments, all I really take away from everything is the last paragraph of Someone88’s initial contribution; otherworldy bliss, like a whisper, a pull, a pontifical connection to a higher realm, a memory - an identity

      My brain, nowadays, only extracts the useful, sees the positive. I still am highly intolerant and have visceral instinctive repulsion which causes me to want to use lethal force to clean up the mess, but I’m straight on the path to Mega-Winning for life, being a Countryside Aristocrat Land Baron *with friends* and hopes of a wholesome future family I shall sire of my own.

      My form of thinking nowadays is deeper; my brain also continues to grow and mature. The bedrock foundation is built, the curiosity largely sated. My Life is headed in the right direction, cruise control to exponential Total Aryan Victory (even if perhaps Prussian might classify me as something, I’m just really secure, I cannot have any vulnerability). And he just sings it out

      Hopefully when I get a new computer I’ll be able to type with my speed of consciousness to make a proper smooth post as usual.

      A Simpler, Deeper, more nuanced, whole, Intuitive, and comprehensive
      A style, a way of Being and Expressing Essence
      A particular flow of the mind

      Gestalt

      Big Neanderthal brain - I think Varg’s thoughts on Neanderthals are more correct, intuitively https://thuleanperspective.com/

      Not only the hormones but also the body-vehicle you ride in (Hamingja / walking in shapes) shapes your experience fundamentally. Every part of your development and anatomy, every part of your body, how full its development, how harmonious it is, the bio-mechanics - The Style!

      I say - more Nordics please, win harder, we cheer you on and hopefully I will be in a future position of such strength as to help build real material hard power - Man Power

      So glad to see the blog taking off - and in such good company as well. Thank you all.

      Delete
    15. As for the question of Nordic or not, when I look at Cicero’s eyes, his face, the bones of his skull, I see an austere intellect descending from and connected to Heaven, the way we can admire in the face of a true Nordic type - perhaps what we see in common is the Solar Warrior - the Sky Father - the Patriarch
      Perhaps the Germans are merely the best and even on the biological level, most perfect expression of that Solar Heroic Ideal, and we see the same noble elevated spirit in the faces of the ancients. Why wouldn’t, why couldn’t they have contributed to the origins of the Mediterranean Aristocracy. There were trade routes from the Baltic Sea to Hellas thousands of years ago…. Apollo spent winter in Hyperborea and summer in Hellas. The Romans write of Ancient Greek stelae monuments on the North Sea by Germany. I’d sooner believe that the Germans ruled and came from Asia / Asgardr / Almakti Ås as Royal Scythian Horselords whose genes played parts in the founding of Royal dynasties as far away as Japan or Persia, as Asha Logos and older genius Classicists expound https://youtu.be/ZHE0AM1VZ6A?si=Ag1BVY8XTYjgX69n

      Julius Evola himself wrote that Rome was clearly connected to the North, and in its Imperial Symbols and Mythological origin stories of Romulus and Remus, the signs of Rome’s Hyperborean origins are confirmed in the Eagle, the Wolf, and the Axe.

      Nowadays I find more meaning in the roaring of a lion or the noises a goat makes, than any human words - they’re just a grand show-chorus of life ever-changing. Violence is Life, and all that this implies

      At least the animals are straight as fuck. Good on ye boys

      Perhaps when I learn and speak Ancient Greek with my family, that will be beautiful, more profound, closer to the source, to Proto-Indo-European, to Nature

      Delete
    16. @Olympic Virility

      It is really all good.
      In some segments, I may overly "romanticised" certain matters, but never for the reason of exclusivity or in an attempt to salt the sea, which is anyway never-ending mystery, but because I don't know any "different" and it is the only way for which I believe one could penetrate the question of UKNOWN - of that what it is out there.

      I hold to the fact that the default program of the mind within the system of simulation is to rationalize historical events in an attempt to drive one away from the personal insight of what it means to him, his being - "Selbst", such as it is the case nowadays with Germans who are completely cut off from the roots for the exact same reason of deliberate programming to keep them oblivious and prone to further engineering & vicious interest of foreign bodies within the state.

      Therefore, I'm not an advocate of a rationalist approach towards history and myths.
      It is a trap that puts you into oblivion.
      I think that limits one not only in his ability to feel and perceive the matter but also express what he felt with that part of himself (Selbst) around which cerebral cortex would only restrain and "bottleneck" him in the attempt to reach the stillness in the centre where he simply, knows it.
      The cosmic war, that has been going on since the dawn of time, is about the Myth - our Myth, a memory only Skalds and Minnesängers could understand.

      Now, Prussian, or someone else here, could say, yeah but what do you have to do with Germany anyway!?
      You are not even German!
      Perhaps not even Nordic of the primordial origin.
      At this point, certainly not, but for times now past, it is a memory I keep in myself from which no one can ever expel me.
      It is a bitter-sweet taste of loving remembrance of what it was and what could have been.
      Inexhaustible longing for the distant point on the horizon amid the new dawn across the universe of inexorable entropy which brings us merciless fight in which one must seek his redemption and ultimate resurrection of the Hero within him - for himself - for the world from which they cut him off, because he is that world, and that world is him.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRmCEGHt-Qk

      Delete
    17. @Olympic Virility, Seeing "Cicero" through the Halo Effect, is not seeing him for who he really is, or for any Roman Statesmen and Figure from history, but seeing them how you "want to" to see them, especially with the Notion of being biased by Lighter hair and Lighter eyes.

      It is an ignorant assumption, and when I look at the bigger picture of all this Nordicist Propaganda, I always see that the "end goal" is always the same with this nonsense.

      It leads to viewing ANYONE who is not of Nordic Ancestry as essentially "Non-European".

      And that is extremely, profoundingly ignorant, and as another Alex had stated, it is on the same level of the Negroes who claim "We Wuz Romans" and "We Wuz Egyptians" and so forth.

      Slavic Races are also heavily known for routinely creating Revisionist Propaganda as well, and they think that they were the real "builders" of Europe.

      Romans and Greeks, have COMPLETELY different Features altogether compared to Nordic Peoples.

      The Skin texture is richer and different in them, they even produce more Sebum and Melanin compared to most Nordic People. They often have thicker hair and very pronounced features, different noses, wider hips, usually very thick Limbs.

      The fact that you ignore these details, shows a complete lack of reflection of historical documentation that many Romans also noted when they had encountered Germanic Tribes in the Northern Regions.

      I beg of you... Tell me, how do you justify the reference to "Nordic" Peoples, on the basis of what the term origin "Nordic" comes from!? Seeing that it was always a blanket reference for peoples who came from the "North" of Europe.

      Tell us, why did the Romans wear Skirts while Germans wore "Trousers", and the Romans teased the Germans for wearing trousers as an "effeminate" Garment at the time, and considered it Barbaric.

      If all these peoples were the same, by your logic and this Nordicist logic, we ought to have been "Kissing Cousins" who had everything in common between Dress Styles, Artifacts, Language and Skin with our Greek and Roman brothers!

      I'd like to see where the evidence of all that is!?

      Nordic People do not have a monopoly on what it means to be of Indo-European descent, or even as a European Race.

      The origins of such Propaganda, could only be the product of Vikings and Celts, maybe even some mixed with Normans, because Germans as a whole would never invent such silly Nordicist Propaganda like this, as its origin comes from those who have an Inferiority Complex and despise Greek and Roman culture inwardly, and probably with the Viking peoples, Scandinavians namely, as they were always inferior and too unorganized to be united in warfare or creating a more powerful and lasting civilization. Vikings, historically have always been cowards, incapable of creating political institutions that are strong, and have a very disordered form of warfare that only suits Individual needs for raiding and pillaging, hardly even close to a purposeful War, and that is the type of minds that come up with this Nordicist Junk.

      Delete
    18. In addition to all this, while we can even go by Anecdotal Evidence that the Greeks, Romans and Germans are all different peoples, they even possess different "energies" as a Race, if you have any ability to endure over 7 hours to listen to an audiobook of Julius Caesar on "The Gallic Wars", which he also discusses much of their encounters with Germans other Tribes up in the North and Geographical details, you would clearly be unable to justify the Romans as being a "Nordic" Race. Even if Julius Caesar was the only source or authority over such documentation:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLAjQEAqbdw

      Delete
    19. "as its origin comes from those who have an Inferiority Complex and despise Greek and Roman culture inwardly, and probably with the Viking peoples,"

      Precisely, only a group of people with an inferiority complex would try to steal someone else's history, instead of being proud of the history of their ancestors.

      "Slavic Races are also heavily known for routinely creating Revisionist Propaganda as well, and they think that they were the real "builders" of Europe."

      The Slavic hordes interfered with the natural evolution of many nations in the Balkans. The oldest languages in south Europe are Greek and Latin, Croatians used to speak Latin up to the 6th century when the Slavic hordes migrated from Eastern Europe down to the Balkans and brought their primitive language with them.

      Delete
    20. Well, I will put forth a few points…. Why was Achilles’ hair and fighting style, as opposed to Hector’s, compared to Fire? His childhood name in the palace of Skyros, Pyrrhus? Why was Achilles mentored in heroism by a Centaur (a Scythian) ?

      Why were the Spartans and Thebans described as blondes, and taller by a head? The Spartan Kings Heraclidae? The Doric invasion the ‘Return of the Heraclidae’ (from the North)? I saw a Greek ceramic depicting black haired Greeks worshipping a Tall Blonde White-Skinned Long-Chinned Nordic Heracles, on a pedestal, nude, with a Club at his side?

      Why do the Pella mosaics depict the Macedonian Argead Princes and Aristocrats on the hunt, the abduction of Helen by Theseus King of Athens, as Blue-Eyed, Orange-Haired, Pale as the fresh Snow? Do you believe that Queen Cleopatra had black hair and sebum-rich skin, really? Because that is the epitome of Greek? I won’t be dragged into the minutiae which I no longer care for - all I care for is the awakening of the Heroic spirit by every means available; the Path of Initiation and Self-Initiation that the real ones follow… ultimately for the building of Hard Power, True Power, Virtú, the capacity for action; the foundation upon which serious violence can be projected in a sustained manner, the ever-intensifying Solar crucible that purifies and replaces as it expands - Empire; Dynamis(m)


      Also, I’ve been meaning to ask you about your being a Witch or some kind of Satanist of the highest order? That Magic is a science? Because apparently Freemasons do this? And there are rites and sacrifices, and burning plants and looking at entrails and making magical objects and all kinds of schizophrenic witch’s recipes? Is Astrology real, the Heavenly Spheres? Is there Logos in the Stars; do you have to be big-brained to see it? Is it even worth seeing it and being magical

      And my friend who is also Redheaded is apparently Rhesus negative blood type - he’s angelic. How were you saying that Rhesus negative means demonic? Because they have no primate antigen? Maybe at some point we’ll get the full story from you? A full reveal of your human classifications, instead of some nit-picking and conjecture, the passing phrase for us mere readers?

      I also as a child had blonde hair and Dark blue eyes ‘like the Ocean’

      Still waiting to discover my blood type. Probably normal.

      Delete
    21. And as for the Nordics and Cicero and such as I had commented in passing- Absolutely! I recognize my extreme ignorance and shall diligently enjoy the De Bello Gallico. I imagine the Romans were largely dark-haired brutes. But the Heroic and Aristocratic Hellenes? There was most definitely an enduring Nordic and Celtic component within the original Hellenic culture, as shown by their rock art stone murals and ceramics depicting red-bearded athletes and ginger figures…
      And very well, I do not see Cicero as he truly was, but what I see in him is the Proto-Indo-European Primordial Master Race essence. Is this essence biological, spiritual? And I would not say that the Nordics are cowardly, and if there were more of them and they didn’t live in an inhospitable environment in the freezing cold, I am sure they would become organized enough for some proper wars. But they were encircled by Christian retards on all sides; all in all I would not discount the Nords so much, they are definitely superior - much more so comparatively in past times. They are Gods, Gotland, Gothenburg, Goth

      ::

      While there isn't a direct Sanskrit translation for "Scandinavia," some theories link the name to the Sanskrit deity "Skanda," which is believed to be related to the origin of the term "Scandinavia," potentially signifying a connection to a "dangerous island" or "land on the water" due to the treacherous coastlines in the region; however, this is not a confirmed linguistic link and should be considered speculative


      I would love to be cured of my ignorance, that’s why I hang around and follow your every word. I only wish I could hear and learn everything that you have to say - in full. For you to transmit and upraise a worthy youth, in your eyes, to continue the Heroic mission forevermore

      I remain ever-curious

      And thank you Someone88 for that beautiful Tannhäuser Overture - that is exactly it; I was nearly swooning listening to it, enchanting

      I was so blessed that my first conscious memory was listening to German Classical music on my back, as a child.

      Delete
  2. Thanks for the Roman shout out. I think most of us have souls. When you consider the family structures we have, and the artistic feats, that are second to none.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Joey Aragon,

      Yes, in some ways, Romans also were far ahead of their time on a lot of cultural aspects and their way of life even from what Germany had developed.

      Germany still never had really positioned itself on the top of the world or the "hill" in the way the Romans did, and in leading an Enduring Empire.

      We were close, but we still did not achieve that position because we had been knocked down time and time again through tragedies, but also some misfortunes in our own course of historical development. Also, our position on the European Continent has never been ideal either, along with harsh climate and minimal resources.

      Delete
  3. Can you do a similar ranking for other continents such as Asia and the Middle-East?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Read Plato, Hm, well both Asians and Arabs have also had their Eras of building civilizations... The New "Master Race" will be the Chinese, but that is according to "Oriental Standards", since Whites are not only displaced, but on track for extinction.

      Delete
    2. The chinese are only superficially a master race, as their modern civilization has been artificially brought about by their true masters with the purpose of using them as a weapon against whites and as an alternative destination for when western civilization is completely destroyed. Their merit is only in the hard work that it took to build what they currently have, but they have basically stolen european knowledge and technology.

      Delete
    3. @Read Plato, That's right, they are not a True Master Race. They will only be the Master Race, relative to the fact that Whites are disenfranchised and eliminated. The Chinese are not a creative race and are very low empathy. But for better or worse, they will be the predominant country of the future, but I don't see them being a First Rate Power. It will be a Technocratic Dystopia, under the NWO.

      Delete
    4. The silver lining is I don't think people trust or like the Chinese, and will piggyback off of them for as long as they can to achieve their own interests. Until that's achieved, and the world has had a good long break from America, I just can't see China having this far reaching influence that America has. Plus China historically never expands much past it's empire, all though I'm sure they will try to copy the west, which they are already attempting to do in Africa and south america. Not sure

      Delete
    5. @PSA Are the japanese also going to be made extinct?

      Delete
  4. Lol before I ever even knew about race it was my German grandpa who I saw as perfect and my favorite one. I've felt his presence a lot in my life, even though he died when I was 5. He is perfect, and all the rest of my problems come from the rest of my family.

    My polish grandma was witty smart & funny but always angry, stirring up arguments, center of the party type, but often mean and too dramatic. I sometimes resented her for the reason I didn't look like my grandpa. She was also insecure and had jealousy issues that played out a lot.

    My mom's side is a cluster mess,
    My grandma was British and hispanic Puerto Rican. She was actually very sweet, but if you look at her parents.... they divorced and her dad was a typical british alcoholic who she only met once who duied in his 50s. Her mom had 6+ husbands....

    My other grandpa was littered with learning issues like ADHD and dyslexia, I've been told he was a jerk and lived a hard life. He was American English/Scottish descent mixed with lesser levels of armenian. His dad was disowned by his family and his mom had runaway from hers at 15!

    Lovely!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Scottish and Armenians are both a scum race.

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    3. "They can be very rude and passive aggressive too"
      Typical British behavior, constant lies, deceit, manipulation, back stabbing, gossiping e.t.c. But if you are a 60 IQ sub-Saharan African they treat you like royalty....They are absolutely pathetic....

      Delete
    4. Yes..... wow, I can't believe it's not just me. That's exactly what experienced, especially in the workplace. And in person. I always had the instinct not to trust them, and they seem secretly judgmental. When people found out I was american they would give each other side-eyes, and I knew they were making a mental note and I felt judging me. Then I would feel everyone's eyes on me. They also would talk about me behind my back at work. Some completely new float I'd never seen before came on the unit, and when she heard my accent she was like- "oh you're that american girl". I also found out some people there had been criticizing behind my back which almost caused me to fail that course. I often felt ....targeted? Idk. Suprisingly, we also had other foreign students and workers, mostly nigerian, and I never really saw that attention or bias being directed at them but maybe I'm wrong.

      Delete
    5. @Alex which part of the UK do u live in?

      Delete
    6. Londonistan.....One of the worst cities on the planet....

      Delete
    7. "Suprisingly, we also had other foreign students and workers, mostly nigerian, and I never really saw that attention or bias being directed at them but maybe I'm wrong."

      The British are passive aggressive cowards, they are always looking for an easy target to take out their frustrations because their life is a joke...They are deathly afraid of being called 'racist', so they never criticize blacks; no matter how terrible their behavior is, but if they come across another Caucasian person from a different country then they see you as fair game...

      Delete
    8. @T345, In the case of the Armenians, it's a really interesting one... Because they are a completely lost and confused people, from Thousands of years of Propagandists who've lied to them about their Racial Origins and Truths, and the Orthodox Church conceals this from them to use them as "Fodder" for their forms of regional warfare.

      The Armenians, are actually a Mongrelized Race of Asiatics not only long conquered many centuries ago from the Mongols, but their primary Racial Origins are not of a Superior race like the Urartanians, which are the former people of that region and over Anatolia who once had a great civilization. They later also expanded across Anatolia and setup the Etruscan Culture of Italy, a very long time ago.

      The Armenians, confuse themselves for the "Urartanians", who were Civilization Builders. You can read back to Ancient Roman Records, they showed the Armenians were always a bully nation that harassed other Nations surrounding them for years, and only ever allied with Persians, because the Armenian Race is actually a Mongrel Race, but mostly composed of Persian and/or Kurdish blood, only under a different name.

      Ever notice that the Armenians seem to ALWAYS be against all Muslims and want to genocide them, but never seem to have a problem with the Iranians, who are their neighbor but by and large, tend to be Islamic?

      In that "Elephant in the room" that never gets brought to attention, lies the secret of the problem with that Race and their entire history for many centuries, even dating back to Persia. Tacitus had many things to say about the betrayals the Armenians committed against Rome, which would have left Armenians a wealthier and more stable people, but they always sided with Persia, even hiring mercenaries to create constant conflicts against the Romans.

      Many centuries of conflict, including their issues with the Turks, also demonstrates that the Armenians never had any real type of solidarity or unity as a people to create any kind of greater civilization or empire.

      They just keep confusing themselves for the Urartians.

      I strongly recommend reading about the Urartians, who were actually an Aryan Peoples from Central Asia. You could even refer to the Urartians as the Prototype of early Tribes that settled within the Italian Peninsula, because they later had formed the Etruscan culture that came from there. It's some really interesting history and reading, including all the artifacts, which are even very common in Italian culture.

      The Armenians still haven't given up their atrocities today, as we see what they did a couple of years ago with trying to find new ways to stir up attentions again with the "Azeris", who are a Turkic people. They stole the land from the Azeris, and then accuse the Azeris of genocide and land stealing, when the Armenians were the ones who did it to them.

      I'm not a major fan of Turkish people, though I don't hold anything specifically against them, they are nowhere near the levels of European culture but have a cultural mix between European influences and Oriental ones along with the Islamic influence there, but the Armenians had no right to do what they have done for centuries, even up to the recent conflict with Azerbaijan.

      Delete
    9. @Alex woah..... I can't imaginging living there. London is like a place u visit once on vacation and that's enough for the rest of your life lol.

      my condolences though, that's like living in the most liberal, bad weather, urban, 'british toxic drinking culture boredom' and expensive place at the same time.

      Aren't you part albanian? Maybe that could be a safe destination for you one day, even though I don't know what it's like, I hope u get out bro

      Delete
    10. @Alex Did they also treat you as one of those 'white immigrant punching bags', seeing that your albanian?

      Delete
    11. Heh, speaking of the "British", the Anglo-Saxons DEFINITELY qualify as the official "Subhuman" species of all Germanic Races, that is absolutely for certain. I rank them even lower than the Dutch.

      Delete
    12. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    13. @T345, Although I don't know your entire family history, I could probably conclude a few things, but if your ancestry traces somewhere into Anatolia, this could be a tricky one, because many people who lived there also included other Races of people like Pontic Greeks, Syrians, Assyrians and others who were integrated into the Ottoman Empire. Though sometimes some of the family surnames, particular the prefix of the surname is often a giveaway from the family lines that lived throughout that region, which often would explain the actual Tribe or people they belong to, and often also was "indicative" of a particular Profession or Caste / Class they belonged to, such as a Peasant type or Farmer, Shoemaker, maybe a Winemaker, and so forth. Many other races have done this historically in the "Family Name", as it was a way to distinguish both your tribe and what type of profession your family name ran into.

      The Ancestry tests are not always indicative 100% of someone's actual origins, but they point to haplogroups that existed or have been traced specifically in those regions.

      For example, I know someone who has a Syrian Name, but is actually of Turkish descent when you really research deeper into their family history. It's amazing the secrets you will find out.

      What I believe may have happened in your family, at least from what things you have said, is that there is definitely a history of some subversive types which have over a period of time interbred into your family, which is likely why it has had a lot of issues with stability so much. This makes sense, and is becoming more and more common with even newer generations, to degrees that were not as bad even before the 20th century.

      One thing about living in "America", and I'm not sure what you will make of this or what it means to you, but while America has technically "tolerated" a whole VAST group of European Genetics from various Immigration Waves, and while America also does not have a defined ethnic enclave or officially declared "group" or Legal Language, A true "American", if you will, is only ever regarded on at least an "unofficial" basis as being either exclusively English, French, or especially of Ulster Scot (Scots-Irish) Ancestry.

      There are American breeds, who can be particularly aggressive, I would think more from the Ulster Scot or French side if they see you have Ulster Scots Ancestors and have interbred with other "suspect" races which could be of either European or Non-European descent.

      The Ulster Scots are extremely fanatical about this, yet they are a bizarre race because they also are a group who has managed to interbreed with nearly every other racial people on earth, without exception.

      They probably are getting more upset, since the Ulster Scots were largely all criminal families who came to the USA, and they knew they lived here on borrowed time, and they are likely mad because they are seeing their social currency and establishment currency vanish. It is a particularly "sensitive" issue to them, and things aren't so great these days in Northern Ireland, or even Scotland for that matter. A totally horrible place!

      Delete
    14. @T345, Also, as bizarre as this may seem too, Americans never were particularly respectful or welcoming of any Scandinavians who settled here, which is very ironic, and especially because many people who came over to the USA from the UK to create settlements here, also had often possessed mixed ancestry from Vikings in them.

      After the Civil War, America completely abandoned its role or focus on the "Nordic" Racial Element, which essentially was the death spell for anyone of various Germanic types in the country, including the Scandinavians, and this is why the ethnic establishment of whom or what is deemed a "Pure-Blooded" American, has become such a controversial question.

      America went from being a predominantly English or "Anglo" creation, to one of Celtic Dominance and today it is largely still run by the Celtic Tribes, they run the majority of Politics and are also heavily involved as Lawyers and in the Construction Fields, as Managers and many other Industries, and have made major alliances with Jews.

      America is really a Celtic Nation today and has been distinctively so since the end result of the Civil War, and no less, with the Calvinist form of Protestant Christianity that came along with it.

      You could say the only "contrast" to that would be the Irish "Catholics" who came later, but even today, America is much more of a Protestant Nation than a Catholic one.

      Delete
    15. @T345,

      Yes, and from my active understanding of the Armenians as the people they are today, it is pretty well evident that a large sizeable amount of them do not understand their real ancestors or who they are, but the Orthodox Church Leadership and their Government DOES and are extremely well aware of these facts.

      So they are basically "thriving" after a Romantic Era of the Superior Urartians who used to inhabit that area and came up with all the things they did.

      The Urartians are mostly an extinct people at this time, but their desire for further colonization and spreading of their Influence led them Westward over time, so I would believe the most of the last remnants of this race, would be the most concentrated in the Modern people today who live in Tuscany, Italy, but far less so in Anatolia and especially in the regions today where Armenians live, because they are pasically a Persian/Kurdish race, even if they refuse to recognize it, and even irrespective of their "surnames".

      Could a stray person from these regions possess some Urartarian Blood? It's possible, but the damage inflicted was done so long ago, and the influence moved away so far from that region, it would be hard pressed to find anyone truly possessing Urartian ancestry in the lands of Central Asia, but that is based on my observations of general racial knowledge of the people there, and migration data.

      The Armenians have basically been "cloaking" themselves in the name of Christianity to get away with many crimes they committed against Neighboring Nations, always claiming they are surrounded by "Enemies" because they are "Islamic", but somehow "Iran" as an Islamic Nation, is not a threat to them, and that is because Iranians are largely, racial brothers of theirs, they are the same blood, so that supercedes any "religious" conflict, which they keep secret to themselves.

      Persians [Modern Time Iranians] are not very well liked by most of the Arabs in that whole region either, because there is a constant rivalry between Arab, Persian and Turkic Dominance in the whole Middle East, and none of these Races get along, even outside of any Religious commonality with "Islam".

      But the Azeris and Turks, absolutely DO have rights to their lands, and should be able to live in peace and without constant threats... What is really telling is that the country "Georgia" which rests above Armenia, even has called Armenia lately on their wrongdoings, and while Georgia is not a very popular country, they have even allowed themselves to become more "Modernized" and prefer to live in peace with neighboring countries, even while Georgia is a Christian Nation. Looking at all this intimately from all sides, the picture becomes much more clear, but at a point of time long before I came to understand most Middle Eastern Conflicts and issues, I also was not entirely sure, because so much Propaganda is slated to make the Armenians look like victims.

      Delete
    16. @T345, CONTINUED:



      But if you were to look at or interact with the Armenians today, whatever country you live in, you will find them to be a people who have a major identity crisis, all kinds of head complexes and social issues as an in-group among themselves, which has never been sorted out, and they keep losing more and more land and are going for broke, along with having absolutely no future as a people, and it's because they do not know who they are and refuse to accept reality and their fate, and refuse to make and honor peace with neighboring Nations and to even sign up to Modernization Agreements which all countries including Russia would much prefer to have with them if it were ever possible, then they could have a real and modern working economy. But they keep refusing it. Russia doesn't really care for them anyways, and just "uses" them, as they have done even under the Tsar, but that's another story.

      Even the Ancient Greeks had a checkered past with the "Persians" and did not like them, saw them as a major threat, though they saw the Carthaginians as a greater threat.

      if there's anything of value I've found in studying history of Racial people and Origins, it is absolutely a MUST to learn every name that various races once lived under or known as, if either a different name given or used, or under different languages.


      For Example, the "Scots" were known as "Pictish" people from the past, which is their older name, and the cover term used to refer to the Celts as "Gauls" was not always clearly discerning information of all the various Celtic Clans that had been found all throughout Europe. Lots of really complex history with them too, in fact I had to go back and forth through many months of confusion once when coming to full understanding about the Migration patterns and actual truth about the Scottish Highlanders vs. Lowlanders. A lot of secrets and mysteries shrouded from the Clannish behaviors in those lands, including understanding the exact relationships and conflicts between so many of these Tribes, even long before they moved to Northern Ireland, with the eventual destination of making it to America.

      Delete
    17. @PSA Interesting......by the way, thank you for this, it has honestly been a huge source of confusion and frustration my entire life.

      I've seen what you're describing with the whole weird American identity issue.
      But ironically, likeyou said, it was my British, 'American' relatives who always initiated and choose to be with people of a very different background, despite having tons of their own kind to choose from. Yet now the 'true Americans' are getting all defensive about racial purity and losing power, yet they're the same kinds that mixed the most in the first place! Then they create a bunch of victims in all of this, like me who end up with a very messed up identity or family, but no accountability for them whatsoever !

      I remember when I was little, feeling not good enough, and not 'part of the team', and wanting to look different. I identified with white people, but people would always tell me I looked latina or mixed, and maybe I was imaginging it...., but I felt like I was treated slightly differently. Now I look more white since my face developed, but it was a huge source of insecurity and loneliness and confusion for me.

      I can't agree with you enough though on what happens when people mix. It's a pity, I actually considered leaving this body because of it & because of my screwed up family, which just highlights how bad this all is!

      Delete
    18. @PSA Interesting.... and many Armenian names I believe are Christianized, so you can't even really tell what their origins are before Christianity. Maybe this Christanization is the reason people misinterpret Armenia being different from Persians... The name on my mom's side is a typical *ian name, with a christian male name at the front, so their origins before christianity are a bit of a mystery.... All I know about them is that they were milk farmers, but that's 2nd hand info and if you go back hundreds of years who knows what could change??

      But yea, Christianity seems like the perfect cover, and American Christians sure ate up the whole Christian victim story!

      I wish I knew more.......
      One annoying thing about some of these subverted people or a family lacking a sort of bond, is that they often don't share much about family history. This goes for both of my grandpas parents. Literally zilch, except for a few elementary things. I really wish I knew more

      Also, I'm sure the 'true Americans' wish that the immigrants were germans and nordids now lol. They really barked up the wrong tree. I live near a city with a large Irish population, and what's interesting their one of the only white groups who are predominately liberal.... This place also sucks no wonder

      How interesting that Urartanian's somehow have a connection with people all the way in Tuscany, I actually met people from Tuscany and they were really good people and very warm and vibrant like that typical Italian stereotype, but not trashy. I would have never thought there was a connection. You know it would be cool if the middle east and central asia had not gone through such an islamization, or genetic and culture wipe from the arab, turkic, and persian islamists.+mongols. It seems like a few thousands years ago the place used to be even more diverse, even having roman, greek, and nomadic European elements in it.

      But, the more I hear about ancient history the more confusing things get, and the more dissapointed I get with how things ended up haha.

      Delete
    19. "T345February 3, 2025 at 3:00 PM
      @Alex Did they also treat you as one of those 'white immigrant punching bags', seeing that your albanian?"
      I'm from the Balkans originally, but not Albanian; I've had several problems with the British scum over the years, I'm planning to get out of this hellhole ASAP. Screw them and their miserable, prison island, let them stay here and rot with the blacks, Indians, Pakis e.t.c.

      Delete
    20. @Alex Jeez, well I hope you get out. Man, somewhere like the Balkans must seem like fairyland compared to London.

      I went from Scotland to a Mediterranean country recently, and it felt like a different continent

      Delete
    21. "I went from Scotland to a Mediterranean country recently, and it felt like a different continent"

      Britain is finished, both the natives and the foreigners are bottom feeders and scum. I've travelled to other parts of Europe and Asia and it's like being on a different planet. In general the people are more polite, civil and are not constantly lying and trying to backstab others...

      Delete
  5. @Gemi, It's a good question, because there are so many qualities we base both objective and subjective attributes in terms of what makes them superior or inferior, between all sorts of intellectual, emotional and creative qualities or temperament.

    Realistically speaking on a broad base, the Negroes and I would say much of the lower castes of Indian people, including Slavs typically make up the "Inferior" Races, but also including certain Europeans who may still have Neanderthal DNA in them.

    That would also make them technically "Subhuman" on any level, because there was a period of some Homo-Sapiens who interbred with the Neanderthals, even though Neanderthals are really "gone".

    Though it is also unfair to categorize every Negro the same, because all Negro races, while they look similar, they have vastly different qualities in them, not just in intellect, but also physically.

    We couldn't categorize Negroes as being "physically" inferior with most attributes.

    For example, the most Intellectually curious Negroes who are levels above most others, are from Kenya, even Ghana to some extent, along with areas of the Sub-Saharan region.

    Those people tend to have higher standards among themselves, but it also does not mean they are not subjected to common characteristics of the Homo-Erectus species, which they descend from.

    This is simply explaining an attribute of how it exists among them, but generally when I attribute value to a race, at least from a German POV, we look at both Intellectual and Emotional Qualities including Balance of these factors within the race, along with how well capable the race is of building a civilization or any type of meaningful progress the race has "performed" in the course of their developmental history, not from any personal biases.

    But I would have to say Slavs can really be almost close to the least in quality as Humans many times too, they pretty much are known as like a "White Negro", looks White on the outside, but has personality and characteristics of a Negro on the inside. Compared to all other Caucasians, the Slav is not a whole Caucasian either, but they rank as one of the least superior, especially among Whites.

    The Jew technically would also fall under such a classification in real terms, but the issue is the Jew has a cunning intelligence. But the Jew is nor creative, nor capable of really building anything, they thrive off of others but get into positions of power, whereas the Negro doesn't. Negroes also do not invest in their own people or build institutions for their own kind, which stands out as a stark difference in them compared to every other Race on Earth, because even Jews invest (the most) in their own people, and every other Race, no matter where they live or emigrate to, have always done this.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The Jew Mind. The Jew god. It doesn't get any worse.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why The US Is Really The Most Hopeless Place To Live